Thabaut A, Meyran M, Huerre M
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 May;33(5):404-7.
In vitro activities of two monobactams (RO 172301 and aztreonam), ceftazidime and cefotaxime against 739 bacterial strains belonging to different species of Gram negative aero-anaerobic bacilli were studied comparatively. Strains were studied according to their resistance phenotype to beta-lactams. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the four antibiotics were determined using the agar dilution method. RO 172301 and aztreonam exhibited a similar activity against P. aeruginosa with a MIC around 2 mg/l for 50% of strains and around 4 mg/l for 90% of strains. As compared to the two monobactams, ceftazidime was more active and cefotaxime less active (one halving dilution either way). Activity of antibiotics was not dependent upon the mechanism of resistance to beta-lactams, except for strains producing a constitutive cephalosporinase. Against Enterobacteriaceae, RO 172301 proved slightly more active than aztreonam and cefotaxime; ceftazidime was the least active drug. Only 12 of the 739 strains tested (1.6%) had a MIC for RO 172301 above 32 mg/l. The percentage of resistant strains was 2.4% for aztreonam and ceftazidime and 8.8% for cefotaxime.
对两种单环β-内酰胺类抗生素(RO 172301和氨曲南)、头孢他啶和头孢噻肟针对739株革兰氏阴性需氧-厌氧杆菌不同菌种的体外活性进行了比较研究。根据菌株对β-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药表型对其进行研究。采用琼脂稀释法测定了这四种抗生素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。RO 172301和氨曲南对铜绿假单胞菌表现出相似的活性,50%的菌株MIC约为2mg/L,90%的菌株MIC约为4mg/L。与两种单环β-内酰胺类抗生素相比,头孢他啶活性更强,头孢噻肟活性较弱(两者相差一个稀释度)。除了产生组成型头孢菌素酶的菌株外,抗生素的活性并不取决于对β-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药机制。针对肠杆菌科细菌,RO 172301的活性略高于氨曲南和头孢噻肟;头孢他啶是活性最低的药物。在739株受试菌株中,只有12株(1.6%)对RO 172301的MIC高于32mg/L。氨曲南和头孢他啶的耐药菌株百分比为2.4%,头孢噻肟为8.8%。