Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, 3011, Switzerland.
Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Nov;40(11):2317-2324. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03231-7. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
To assess in a phantom and in a clinical study the influence of different reconstruction parameters on quantitative SPECT/CT values in the assessment of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR-CA).
A hybrid SPECT/CT camera with a proprietary software for SPECT/CT-based quantification of myocardial uptake of Tc-DPD was used. Images were reconstructed with 6 different protocols, differing in iterations, subset and Gaussian filter. Quantitative values were tested in phantom and clinical studies across different reconstruction protocols. Values were automatically calculated both as kBq/ml and as maximum, mean and peak standardized uptake value (SUV).
The standard parameters provided by the manufacturer (reconstruction 1) yielded higher accuracy in quantifying, with measuring 97.1% of the expected activity in the phantom. Reconstructions with higher Gaussian filter caused a systematic underestimation of quantified values of 27.2% (p < 0.01). Results were replicated in the clinical study consisting of 155 patients with suspected ATTR-CA, wherein changing the number of iterations and subsets was not associated with a statistically significant difference in quantitative values compared to reconstruction 1, while a higher Gaussian filter caused inaccurate quantification with up to 24% of difference measured.
Different reconstruction parameters can impact quantitative values on Tc-DPD SPECT/CT. Therefore, parameters should be maintained consistently across different acquisitions and different centres.
在体模和临床研究中评估不同重建参数对心脏转甲状腺素淀粉样变性(ATTR-CA)评估中 SPECT/CT 定量值的影响。
使用配备专有软件的 SPECT/CT 混合相机,用于基于 SPECT/CT 定量评估 Tc-DPD 在心肌摄取中的应用。使用 6 种不同的协议进行图像重建,这些协议在迭代、子集和高斯滤波器方面有所不同。在不同的重建协议中,在体模和临床研究中对定量值进行了测试。值自动以 kBq/ml 和最大、平均和峰值标准化摄取值(SUV)计算。
制造商提供的标准参数(重建 1)在定量方面具有更高的准确性,在体模中测量到 97.1%的预期活动。具有更高高斯滤波器的重建会导致定量值系统低估 27.2%(p<0.01)。该结果在包含 155 名疑似 ATTR-CA 患者的临床研究中得到了复制,其中改变迭代次数和子集与重建 1 相比,定量值没有统计学差异,而更高的高斯滤波器会导致不准确的定量,测量差异高达 24%。
不同的重建参数会影响 Tc-DPD SPECT/CT 的定量值。因此,在不同的采集和不同的中心之间,参数应保持一致。