Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Nov;6(11):e848-e856. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00143-2. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
The widespread use of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (known as ChatGPT) and other emerging technology that is powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has drawn attention to the potential ethical issues they can cause, especially in high-stakes applications such as health care, but ethical discussions have not yet been translated into operationalisable solutions. Furthermore, ongoing ethical discussions often neglect other types of GenAI that have been used to synthesise data (eg, images) for research and practical purposes, which resolve some ethical issues and expose others. We did a scoping review of the ethical discussions on GenAI in health care to comprehensively analyse gaps in the research. To reduce the gaps, we have developed a checklist for comprehensive assessment and evaluation of ethical discussions in GenAI research. The checklist can be integrated into peer review and publication systems to enhance GenAI research and might be useful for ethics-related disclosures for GenAI-powered products and health-care applications of such products and beyond.
Chat 生成式预训练转换器(称为 ChatGPT)和其他新兴技术的广泛应用,这些技术由生成式人工智能(GenAI)提供支持,引起了人们对它们可能引发的潜在伦理问题的关注,特别是在医疗保健等高风险应用中,但伦理讨论尚未转化为可操作的解决方案。此外,正在进行的伦理讨论往往忽略了其他类型的 GenAI,这些 GenAI 已被用于为研究和实际目的合成数据(例如图像),从而解决了一些伦理问题并暴露出了其他问题。我们对医疗保健中关于 GenAI 的伦理讨论进行了范围综述,以全面分析研究中的差距。为了缩小差距,我们开发了一个清单,用于全面评估和评估 GenAI 研究中的伦理讨论。该清单可以集成到同行评审和出版系统中,以加强 GenAI 研究,对于与伦理相关的 GenAI 产品披露以及此类产品和其他产品的医疗保健应用可能会很有用。