Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶和头孢曲松的体外抗菌活性及回归研究

Antibacterial activity in vitro and regression studies for ceftazidime and ceftriaxone.

作者信息

Frimodt-Møller N, Højbjerg T, Hvass E, Møller S, Mortensen I, Thomsen V F

出版信息

Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1985 Jun;93(3):181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02874.x.

Abstract

The antibacterial activity in vitro of ceftazidime and ceftriaxone was investigated against 575 recent clinical isolates. Both cephalosporins displayed excellent activity against most of the pathogens tested, in particular Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Apart from the Pseudomonas group, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Campylobacter jejuni ceftriaxone was slightly to moderately more active than ceftazidime overall. Ceftriaxone was moderately active against Streptococcus faecalis. Regression lines for the two antibiotics were almost identical. Corresponding to differences in susceptibility, the zone sizes differed for the two drugs with respect to certain bacterial groups, e.g. Pseudomonas sp. and enterococci. Therefore, the two cephalosporins cannot substitute for each other in disc susceptibility testing. Breakpoints for disc tests around 8-16 micrograms/ml, as suggested in the literature, appear too high considering the beneficial pharmacokinetic properties of the two drugs.

摘要

研究了头孢他啶和头孢曲松对575株近期临床分离菌株的体外抗菌活性。两种头孢菌素对大多数测试病原体,特别是革兰氏阴性菌,包括铜绿假单胞菌,均表现出优异的活性。除假单胞菌属外,总体上头孢曲松对醋酸钙不动杆菌和空肠弯曲菌的活性略高于或中度高于头孢他啶。头孢曲松对粪肠球菌有中度活性。两种抗生素的回归线几乎相同。对应于敏感性差异,两种药物对某些细菌群体,如假单胞菌属和肠球菌,抑菌圈大小不同。因此,在纸片药敏试验中,这两种头孢菌素不能相互替代。考虑到这两种药物有益的药代动力学特性,文献中建议的纸片试验断点约为8-16微克/毫升似乎过高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验