Vágvölgyi Réka, Sahlender Moritz, Schröter Hannes, Nagengast Benjamin, Dresler Thomas, Schrader Josef, Nuerk Hans-Christoph
Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Centre for Cognitive Science, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
German Institute for Adult Education - Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning (Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung - Leibniz-Zentrum für Lebenslanges Lernen e.V.), Bonn, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1422896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422896. eCollection 2024.
Despite having sufficient formal education, a large group of people cannot complete everyday tasks like reading, writing, or making basic calculations. Regarding reading, millions of people are not able to understand more complex texts despite the ability to read simple words or sentences; they have low literacy skills. Even though this problem has been known for decades, the causes and predictors of their poor reading comprehension skills are not fully explored. Socioeconomic, sociodemographic, and reading-related (i.e., linguistic) factors, especially of English-speaking participants and thus users of an opaque orthography, were often assessed. The goal of this study was to examine which linguistic, domain-general, or numerical factors predict substandard complex text reading as the core symptom of low literacy skills in adulthood.
To this end, we assessed a group of German-speaking participants-users of a transparent orthography-who are at risk for complex text reading deficits.
The results indicated that linguistic variables (reduced word/pseudoword reading, weaker oral semantic and grammatical comprehension), working memory, and age predicted lower performance in text comprehension. This model explained 73% of the total variance, indicating that most of the deficits in complex text reading can be explained by a group of basic underlying linguistic and domain-general factors.
We conclude that interventions for adults with low literacy skills and others at risk for complex text reading deficits should address word/pseudoword reading and focus on both written and oral comprehension.
尽管接受了足够的正规教育,但仍有一大群人无法完成诸如阅读、写作或进行基本计算等日常任务。在阅读方面,数以百万计的人虽然能够阅读简单的单词或句子,但却无法理解更复杂的文本;他们的读写能力较低。尽管这个问题已经存在了几十年,但其阅读理解能力差的原因和预测因素尚未得到充分探究。社会经济、社会人口统计学以及与阅读相关(即语言方面)的因素,尤其是以英语为母语的参与者以及使用不透明正字法的使用者,经常被评估。本研究的目的是检验哪些语言、一般领域或数字因素能够预测作为成人低读写能力核心症状的复杂文本阅读能力不足。
为此,我们评估了一组有复杂文本阅读缺陷风险的德语使用者——使用透明正字法的人群。
结果表明,语言变量(单词/假词阅读能力下降、口语语义和语法理解能力较弱)、工作记忆和年龄预测了文本理解能力较低。该模型解释了总方差的73%,这表明复杂文本阅读中的大多数缺陷可以由一组基本的潜在语言和一般领域因素来解释。
我们得出结论,针对低读写能力的成年人以及其他有复杂文本阅读缺陷风险的人的干预措施应针对单词/假词阅读,并注重书面和口语理解。