Tighe Elizabeth L, Schatschneider Christopher
Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2016 Jul;49(4):395-409. doi: 10.1177/0022219414555415. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
The current study employed a meta-analytic approach to investigate the relative importance of component reading skills to reading comprehension in struggling adult readers. A total of 10 component skills were consistently identified across 16 independent studies and 2,707 participants. Random effects models generated 76 predictor-reading comprehension effect sizes among the 10 constructs. The results indicated that six of the component skills exhibited strong relationships with reading comprehension (average rs ≥ .50): morphological awareness, language comprehension, fluency, oral vocabulary knowledge, real word decoding, and working memory. Three of the component skills yielded moderate relationships with reading comprehension (average rs ≥ .30 and < .50): pseudoword decoding, orthographic knowledge, and phonological awareness. Rapid automatized naming (RAN) was the only component skill that was weakly related to reading comprehension (r = .15). Morphological awareness was a significantly stronger correlate of reading comprehension than phonological awareness and RAN. This study provides the first attempt at a systematic synthesis of the recent research investigating the reading skills of adults with low literacy skills, a historically understudied population. Directions for future research, the relation of our results to the children's literature, and the implications for researchers and adult basic education programs are discussed.
本研究采用元分析方法,以探究在阅读方面存在困难的成年读者中,各项阅读技能组成部分对阅读理解的相对重要性。在16项独立研究和2707名参与者中,共持续识别出10项组成技能。随机效应模型在这10个结构中产生了76个预测变量与阅读理解的效应量。结果表明,其中六项组成技能与阅读理解呈现出强相关关系(平均相关系数rs≥0.50):词法意识、语言理解、流畅性、口头词汇知识、实词解码和工作记忆。三项组成技能与阅读理解呈现出中度相关关系(平均相关系数rs≥0.30且<0.50):假词解码、正字法知识和语音意识。快速自动命名(RAN)是唯一一项与阅读理解弱相关的组成技能(r = 0.15)。词法意识与阅读理解的相关性显著强于语音意识和快速自动命名。本研究首次尝试对近期有关低读写能力成年人阅读技能的研究进行系统综述,这是一个长期以来未得到充分研究的群体。文中讨论了未来研究的方向、我们的研究结果与儿童文献的关系以及对研究人员和成人基础教育项目的启示。