Lee Seung-Min, Haan Chan-Hoon
Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, Republic of Korea.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 3;10(17):e37042. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37042. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
Different partition layouts were compared to determine how to increase speech privacy while maintaining communication efficiency between workers in an open-plan office. A preliminary survey was used to determine current usage and conditions of partitions in open-plan offices. The survey results were used to select four partition layouts for testing: face-to-face, parallel, crossed-rod, and orthogonal. A computer modeling was used to test the partition layouts at three different partition heights: 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 m. The modeling results showed that the parallel- and crossed-rod-type layouts offered the best speech privacy at the lowest partition height, but the differences among layouts disappeared as the partition height was increased. Furthermore, an acoustic field experiment was performed using partitions with a 1.5 m height following the ISO 3382-3 standard. The experimental results showed that the face-to-face layout resulted in the least speech privacy. Based on these results, an open-plan office needs to ensure that workers are spaced a sufficient distance apart and that they do not face each other to ensure speech privacy. Additionally, speech privacy should be considered in the design stage of the office space.
比较了不同的隔断布局,以确定如何在开放式办公室中提高语音隐私性,同时保持员工之间的沟通效率。通过初步调查来确定开放式办公室中隔断的当前使用情况和条件。调查结果用于选择四种隔断布局进行测试:面对面、平行、交叉杆和正交。使用计算机建模在三种不同的隔断高度(1.2米、1.5米和1.8米)下测试隔断布局。建模结果表明,平行和交叉杆式布局在最低隔断高度时提供了最佳的语音隐私性,但随着隔断高度的增加,布局之间的差异消失。此外,按照ISO 3382-3标准,使用高度为1.5米的隔断进行了声场实验。实验结果表明,面对面布局导致的语音隐私性最差。基于这些结果,开放式办公室需要确保员工之间保持足够的距离,并且他们不要面对面,以确保语音隐私。此外,在办公空间的设计阶段应考虑语音隐私性。