Hirabayashi N, Nosoh Y, Nishiyama M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshinaka K, Niimoto M, Hattori T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1985 Sep;12(9):1808-12.
Comparative studies between the in vitro human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) and our original in vivo method (NM-IA) in which the final evaluation was made with 3H-TdR incorporation of tumor cells transplanted into nude mice were simultaneously performed on 44 fresh human solid tumors (22 gastric cancers, 6 breast cancers, 4 gall bladder cancers, 4 liposarcomas and 8 other tumors). Mitomycin C (MMC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin (ADM) and cyclophosphamide (CPM) were tested. The evaluable rate was 73% (32/44) in HTCA and 89% (38/44) in NM-IA. Although correlation between the results of HTCA and those of MN-IA was obtained for MMC and ADM, no correlation was observed for 5-FU and CPM.
对44例新鲜人实体瘤(22例胃癌、6例乳腺癌、4例胆囊癌、4例脂肪肉瘤和8例其他肿瘤)同时进行了体外人肿瘤克隆形成试验(HTCA)与我们最初的体内方法(NM-IA,通过将移植到裸鼠体内的肿瘤细胞掺入3H-TdR进行最终评估)之间的比较研究。测试了丝裂霉素C(MMC)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)、阿霉素(ADM)和环磷酰胺(CPM)。HTCA的可评估率为73%(32/44),NM-IA的可评估率为89%(38/44)。虽然MMC和ADM的HTCA结果与MN-IA结果之间存在相关性,但5-FU和CPM未观察到相关性。