非侵入性神经调节是否是改善获得性脑损伤个体神经可塑性的可行技术?综述。

Is non-invasive neuromodulation a viable technique to improve neuroplasticity in individuals with acquired brain injury? A review.

作者信息

Eliason Michelle, Kalbande Prajakta Premchand, Saleem Ghazala T

机构信息

Rehabilitation Science Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 4;18:1341707. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1341707. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore and evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) as a standalone or coupled intervention and understand its mechanisms to produce positive alterations in neuroplasticity and behavioral outcomes after acquired brain injury (ABI).

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched from January 2013 to January 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Using the PICO framework, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective, pilot, open-label, and observational large group and single-participant case studies were included. Two authors reviewed articles according to pre-established inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data related to participant and intervention characteristics, mechanisms of change, methods, and outcomes were extracted by two authors. The two authors performed quality assessments using SORT.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies involving 657 participants diagnosed with ABIs were included. Two studies reported that NIBS was ineffective in producing positive alterations or behavioral outcomes. Twenty studies reported at least one, or a combination of, positively altered neuroplasticity and improved neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, motor, or somatic symptoms. Twenty-eight current articles between 2020 and 2024 have been studied to elucidate potential mechanisms of change related to NIBS and other mediating or confounding variables.

DISCUSSION

tDCS and TMS may be efficacious as standalone interventions or coupled with neurorehabilitation therapies to positively alter maladaptive brain physiology and improve behavioral symptomology resulting from ABI. Based on postintervention and follow-up results, evidence suggests NIBS may offer a direct or mediatory contribution to improving behavioral outcomes post-ABI.

CONCLUSION

More research is needed to better understand the extent of rTMS and tDCS application in affecting changes in symptoms after ABI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探索和评估非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)作为一种独立或联合干预措施的疗效,并了解其在获得性脑损伤(ABI)后产生神经可塑性和行为结果积极改变的机制。

数据来源

检索了2013年1月至2024年1月期间的Cochrane图书馆、科学网、PubMed和谷歌学术数据库。

研究选择

采用PICO框架,纳入经颅磁刺激(TMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的随机对照试验(RCT)、回顾性研究、试点研究、开放标签研究以及观察性大组和单参与者案例研究。两位作者根据预先确定的纳入标准对文章进行了审查。

数据提取

两位作者提取了与参与者和干预特征、变化机制、方法和结果相关的数据。两位作者使用SORT进行了质量评估。

结果

纳入了22项涉及657名被诊断为ABI的参与者的研究。两项研究报告称,NIBS在产生积极改变或行为结果方面无效。20项研究报告了至少一种或多种神经可塑性的积极改变以及神经心理、神经精神、运动或躯体症状的改善。对2020年至2024年间的28篇当前文章进行了研究,以阐明与NIBS以及其他中介或混杂变量相关的潜在变化机制。

讨论

tDCS和TMS作为独立干预措施或与神经康复治疗联合使用,可能有效地积极改变适应性不良的脑生理学,并改善ABI导致的行为症状。根据干预后和随访结果,有证据表明NIBS可能对改善ABI后的行为结果有直接或中介作用。

结论

需要更多的研究来更好地了解重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在影响ABI后症状变化方面的应用程度。

相似文献

[6]
[10]

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索