• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹直肌分离相关原发性腹侧疝修补的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes of primary ventral hernia repair associated with rectus diastasis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avda. Manuel Siurot S/N, 41013, Seville, Spain.

Faculty of Education Sciences, Physical Education and Sports, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2611-2616. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01997-y. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01997-y
PMID:39300041
Abstract

Primary ventral hernia repair is a common global surgical procedure, entailing economic burdens and recurrence challenges. Rectus diastasis (RD) is considered a risk factor for midline defects and treatment is symptom-based. When primary ventral hernia and RD coexist, management still remains unclear. This study aims to analyze recurrence rates in patients after umbilical/epigastric hernia repair with untreated diastasis. Observational and retrospective cohort study of 74 patients assessing the recurrence rate of umbilical or epigastric hernias in patients operated with or without RD. Data were obtained from a tertiary hospital's patients between 2015 and 2017. Medium-term recurrences were analyzed after at least 3 year follow up. We compared demographic data, presence of RD (defined as rectus muscles separation exceeding 2 cm), type of repair and surgical complications. Data on 74 patients were collected. The mean age was 57.08 years, and the mean BMI was 31.27 kg/m. Thirty-one included patients were females (42.9%). RD was documented in 67.1% of the sample. Mean follow-up was 4.23 (± 2.53) years. Postoperative complications were predominantly grade 1 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with a 17.14% surgical site infection rate. Female gender (p = 0.039), diabetes (0.016), and RD (0.049) showed statistically significant differences in predicting the risk of medium-term recurrence. Patients with untreated RD face a higher risk of medium-term recurrence following primary ventral hernia repair. Additionally, female gender and diabetes were found to be independent risk factors. Prospective studies are recommended to further assist surgeons in choosing the optimal surgical strategy for patients with umbilical hernia and associated RD.

摘要

原发性腹侧疝修补术是一种常见的全球外科手术,涉及经济负担和复发挑战。腹直肌分离(RD)被认为是中线缺损的危险因素,治疗基于症状。当原发性腹侧疝和 RD 并存时,其管理仍不清楚。本研究旨在分析未治疗的 RD 对脐疝/上腹部疝修补术后患者复发率的影响。对 74 例患者进行观察性和回顾性队列研究,评估 RD 存在或不存在的患者行脐疝/上腹部疝修补术后脐疝或上腹部疝的复发率。数据来自 2015 年至 2017 年一家三级医院的患者。至少随访 3 年后分析中期复发。我们比较了人口统计学数据、RD 的存在(定义为腹直肌分离超过 2cm)、修复类型和手术并发症。共收集了 74 例患者的数据。平均年龄为 57.08 岁,平均 BMI 为 31.27kg/m。31 例患者为女性(42.9%)。67.1%的样本记录了 RD。平均随访时间为 4.23(±2.53)年。术后并发症主要为 Clavien-Dindo 分级 1 级,手术部位感染率为 17.14%。女性(p=0.039)、糖尿病(0.016)和 RD(0.049)在预测中期复发风险方面存在统计学差异。未治疗 RD 的患者在接受原发性腹侧疝修补术后,面临更高的中期复发风险。此外,女性和糖尿病被发现是独立的危险因素。建议进行前瞻性研究,以进一步帮助外科医生为合并 RD 的脐疝患者选择最佳手术策略。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of primary ventral hernia repair associated with rectus diastasis.腹直肌分离相关原发性腹侧疝修补的长期结果。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2611-2616. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01997-y. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Minimal Invasive Linea Alba Reconstruction for the Treatment of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias with Coexisting Rectus Abdominis Diastasis.白线微创重建术治疗合并腹直肌分离的脐疝和上腹部疝
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1223-1228. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0018. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair (LaHRR): a case-series of 17 patients treated with a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia and diastasis repair.腹腔镜肌后疝修补术(LaHRR):采用一种新的腹腔镜腹疝和分离修补技术治疗的 17 例患者的病例系列。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4745-4752. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11012-5. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Severe rectus diastasis with midline hernia associated in males: high recurrence in mid-term follow-up of minimally invasive surgical technique.男性严重腹直肌分离伴中线疝:微创手术技术中期随访中高复发率。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):335-345. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02706-7. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
Diastasis Recti with Concomitant Ventral Hernia Repair: An Initial Experience in the United Arab Emirates Population.腹直肌分离伴发腹疝修补术:阿拉伯联合酋长国人群的初步经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Oct;34(10):904-909. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0216. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
6
Comorbid rectus abdominis diastasis is a risk factor for recurrence of umbilical hernia in Japanese patients.合并存在腹直肌分离是日本患者脐疝复发的一个风险因素。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):368-372. doi: 10.1111/ases.12868. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
7
Minimally invasive bilayer suturing technique for the repair of concomitant ventral hernias and diastasis recti.微创双层缝合技术修复合并的腹疝和腹直肌分离。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5326-5334. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10034-9. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
8
Robotic transabdominal retromuscular rectus diastasis (r-TARRD) repair: a new approach.机器人经腹肌后直肌分离修复术(r-TARRD):一种新方法。
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1501-1509. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02547-w. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Lateral single-dock robot-assisted retro-rectus ventral hernia repair (rTARUP/rTARM): observational study on long-term follow-up.外侧单对接机器人辅助经腹直肌后入路腹外疝修补术(rTARUP/rTARM):长期随访观察研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 27;19(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02243-2.
10
MILOS and EMILOS repair of primary umbilical and epigastric hernias.MILOS 和 EMILOS 修复脐疝和腹上疝。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):935-944. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02056-x. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Rectus diastasis in males: a narrative review.男性腹直肌分离:一篇叙述性综述。
Hernia. 2025 Jun 26;29(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03404-w.

本文引用的文献

1
A Prospective Observational Study of Ventral Hernia.一项关于腹疝的前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2022 Aug 21;14(8):e28240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28240. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Emergency repair and smoking predict recurrence in a large cohort of ventral hernia patients.紧急修复和吸烟可预测大样本腹疝患者的复发。
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1337-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02672-0. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
Risks and Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Hernia Mesh Repair and the Predictive Utility of ACS-NSQIP.疝补片修复术后手术部位感染的风险和预防及 ACS-NSQIP 的预测效用。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Apr;26(4):950-964. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05248-6. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for Mesh infection following Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair Surgery.系统评价和荟萃分析腹壁疝修补术后网片感染的危险因素。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt A):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.024. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
5
Author response to: European Hernia Society guidelines on management of rectus diastasis.作者对《欧洲疝学会关于腹直肌分离管理的指南》的回应。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):e42. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab393.
6
European Hernia Society guidelines on management of rectus diastasis.欧洲疝学会关于腹直肌分离管理的指南。
Br J Surg. 2021 Oct 23;108(10):1189-1191. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab128.
7
Ventral hernia and diastasis recti. Is there a consensus?腹疝与腹直肌分离。是否存在共识?
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):823. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02471-z.
8
Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.识别腹疝复发的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa071.
9
Assessment of potential influencing factors on the outcome in small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernia repair: a registry-based multivariable analysis of 31,965 patients.评估小(<2 厘米)脐疝修补术结局的潜在影响因素:基于登记的 31965 例患者的多变量分析。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):587-603. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02305-4. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
10
Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society.欧洲疝学会和美洲疝学会关于脐疝和腹疝治疗的指南。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):171-190. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11489. Epub 2020 Jan 9.