• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝达喹啉耐药概率对耐利福平结核病治疗决策的影响。

Impact of bedaquiline resistance probability on treatment decision for rifampicin-resistant TB.

作者信息

Trang T P H, Kessels R, Decroo T, Van Rie A

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

IJTLD Open. 2024 Sep 1;1(9):384-390. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362
PMID:39301135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance remains challenging. A Bayesian approach expresses this uncertainty as a probability of BDQ resistance (prBDQ) with a 95% credible interval. We investigated how prBDQ information influences BDQ prescribing decisions.

METHOD

We performed a discrete choice experiment with 55 international rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis physicians. We employed mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to quantify the effect of prBDQ, patient attributes, and contextual factors on the decision to continue BDQ or not when sequencing results become available.

RESULTS

PrBDQ was the most influential factor for BDQ decision-making, three times greater than treatment response. Each percentage point increase in prBDQ resulted in 8.2% lower odds (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.93) of continuing BDQ as a fully effective drug and 5.0% lower odds (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) of continuing it but not counting it as an effective drug. The most favourable patient profile for prescribing BDQ as a fully effective drug was a patient receiving the BPaLM regimen (BDQ, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) with low prBDQ, good 1-month treatment response, fluoroquinolone-susceptible TB, and no prior BDQ treatment. Physicians with higher discomfort with uncertainty and more years of experience with BDQ were more inclined to stop BDQ.

CONCLUSION

Given the uncertainty of genotype-phenotype associations, physicians valued prBDQ for BDQ decision-making in rifampicin-resistant TB treatment.

摘要

背景

准确诊断贝达喹啉(BDQ)耐药性仍然具有挑战性。贝叶斯方法将这种不确定性表示为BDQ耐药概率(prBDQ)及95%可信区间。我们研究了prBDQ信息如何影响BDQ的处方决策。

方法

我们对55名国际耐利福平结核病医生进行了离散选择实验。我们采用混合效应多项逻辑回归来量化prBDQ、患者属性和背景因素对测序结果出来后继续使用或停用BDQ决策的影响。

结果

prBDQ是BDQ决策中最具影响力的因素,其影响力是治疗反应的三倍。prBDQ每增加一个百分点,将BDQ作为完全有效药物继续使用的几率降低8.2%(比值比[OR]0.92,95%可信区间0.90 - 0.93),将其作为非有效药物继续使用的几率降低5.0%(OR 0.95,95%可信区间0.94 - 0.96)。将BDQ作为完全有效药物处方的最有利患者特征是接受BPaLM方案(BDQ、普瑞玛尼、利奈唑胺和莫西沙星)的患者,其prBDQ较低、1个月治疗反应良好、对氟喹诺酮敏感的结核病且既往未接受过BDQ治疗。对不确定性不适感较高且有更多BDQ使用经验的医生更倾向于停用BDQ。

结论

鉴于基因型 - 表型关联的不确定性,医生在耐利福平结核病治疗的BDQ决策中重视prBDQ。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4389/11409166/5dfa1e9f3182/ijtldopen24-0362f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4389/11409166/2b96684148e7/ijtldopen24-0362f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4389/11409166/5dfa1e9f3182/ijtldopen24-0362f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4389/11409166/2b96684148e7/ijtldopen24-0362f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4389/11409166/5dfa1e9f3182/ijtldopen24-0362f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of bedaquiline resistance probability on treatment decision for rifampicin-resistant TB.贝达喹啉耐药概率对耐利福平结核病治疗决策的影响。
IJTLD Open. 2024 Sep 1;1(9):384-390. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0362. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Bedaquiline resistance probability to guide treatment decision making for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: insights from a qualitative study.贝达喹啉耐药概率指导利福平耐药结核病治疗决策:一项定性研究的见解。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07865-7.
3
Impact and cost-effectiveness of the 6-month BPaLM regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Moldova: A mathematical modeling analysis.摩尔多瓦利福平耐药结核病 6 个月 BPaLM 方案的影响和成本效益:一项数学建模分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 3;21(5):e1004401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004401. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing regimens for treatment on patients with refractory RR/MDR/XDR-tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study in East China.含贝达喹啉方案治疗耐多药/广泛耐药/甚至全耐药结核病患者的有效性和安全性:华东地区的一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07693-9.
5
Comparative Efficacy of the Novel Diarylquinoline TBAJ-876 and Bedaquiline against a Resistant Mutant in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis.新型二芳基喹啉 TBAJ-876 与贝达喹啉对耐多药结核分枝杆菌感染小鼠模型的疗效比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Nov 17;65(12):e0141221. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01412-21. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
[Study on the resistance of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis to anti-tuberculosis drugs in group A].A组耐利福平结核分枝杆菌对抗结核药物的耐药性研究
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 12;46(11):1110-1117. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20230804-00046.
7
Primary bedaquiline resistance in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan.乌兹别克斯坦卡拉卡尔帕克斯坦出现原发性贝达喹啉耐药。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 May 1;27(5):381-386. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0536.
8
Bedaquiline Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Rifampicin-Resistant Isolates in Zhejiang, China.中国浙江地区耐利福平菌株的贝达喹啉耐药性及分子特征
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Oct 31;16:6951-6963. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S429003. eCollection 2023.
9
Safety and effectiveness of all-oral and injectable-containing, bedaquiline-based long treatment regimen for pre-XDR tuberculosis in Vietnam.越南含贝达喹啉的全口服和含注射剂的长疗程治疗方案用于治疗广泛耐药前结核病的安全性和有效性。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 14;13:1023704. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1023704. eCollection 2022.
10
Definitive outcomes in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treated in Niger from 2012 to 2019: A retrospective cohort study.2012 年至 2019 年在尼日尔接受利福平耐药结核病治疗的患者的明确结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Health. 2023 May 2;15(3):258-264. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac016.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical best practices for caring for people with expanded resistance to newer TB drugs.针对对新型结核病药物具有广泛耐药性患者的临床最佳护理实践。
IJTLD Open. 2025 Jun 13;2(6):315-323. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0240. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Bedaquiline resistance in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.南非开普敦耐多药结核病患者中的贝达喹啉耐药性:一项回顾性纵向队列研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Dec;4(12):e972-e982. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00172-6. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
2
Implementation of targeted next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in low-resource settings: a programmatic model, challenges, and initial outcomes.在资源有限的环境下实施靶向二代测序诊断耐药结核病的方案:方案模型、挑战和初步结果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1204064. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204064. eCollection 2023.
3
A Bayesian approach to estimate the probability of resistance to bedaquiline in the presence of a genomic variant.
贝叶斯方法估计存在基因组变异时对贝达喹啉的耐药概率。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0287019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287019. eCollection 2023.
4
Minimum inhibitory concentrations and sequencing data have to be analysed in more detail to set provisional epidemiological cut-off values for complex.必须更详细地分析最低抑菌浓度和测序数据,以设定复杂情况的临时流行病学截断值。
Eur Respir J. 2023 May 5;61(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02397-2022. Print 2023 May.
5
Bedaquiline resistance probability to guide treatment decision making for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: insights from a qualitative study.贝达喹啉耐药概率指导利福平耐药结核病治疗决策:一项定性研究的见解。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07865-7.
6
Association of Self-reported Primary Care Physician Tolerance for Uncertainty With Variations in Resource Use and Patient Experience.自我报告的初级保健医生对不确定性的容忍度与资源利用和患者体验的变化相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29521.
7
Implications of bedaquiline-resistant tuberculosis.耐贝达喹啉结核病的影响
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;22(2):166. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00007-X.
8
A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.一种用于选择纳入离散选择实验的属性的新颖设计过程:探索急性缺血性中风治疗中溶栓临床决策差异的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3305-5.
9
Translational Genomics in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Opportunities and Challenges.低收入和中等收入国家的转化基因组学:机遇与挑战
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(4):242-7. doi: 10.1159/000433518. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
10
Public preferences for prioritizing preventive and curative health care interventions: a discrete choice experiment.公众对预防性和治疗性医疗保健干预措施进行优先排序的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2015 Mar;18(2):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.007.