错误信息干预评估中的重点转移。
A focus shift in the evaluation of misinformation interventions.
作者信息
Tay Li Qian, Lewandowsky Stephan, Hurlstone Mark J, Kurz Tim, Ecker Ullrich K H
机构信息
School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, UK.
出版信息
Harv Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev. 2023 Oct;4(5). doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-124. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
Abstract
The proliferation of misinformation has prompted significant research efforts, leading to the development of a wide range of interventions. There is, however, insufficient guidance on how to evaluate these interventions. Here, we argue that researchers should consider not just the interventions' primary effectiveness but also ancillary outcomes and implementation challenges.
摘要
错误信息的扩散促使了大量的研究工作，从而催生出一系列广泛的干预措施。然而，对于如何评估这些干预措施，却缺乏足够的指导。在此，我们认为研究人员不仅应考虑干预措施的主要效果，还应考虑辅助结果和实施挑战。
相似文献
1
A focus shift in the evaluation of misinformation interventions.错误信息干预评估中的重点转移。
Harv Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev. 2023 Oct;4(5). doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-124. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Interventions to Mitigate COVID-19 Misinformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.缓解 COVID-19 错误信息的干预措施：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Health Commun. 2021 Dec 2;26(12):846-857. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.2021460. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
3
Lessons Learned From Interdisciplinary Efforts to Combat COVID-19 Misinformation: Development of Agile Integrative Methods From Behavioral Science, Data Science, and Implementation Science.从跨学科抗击新冠疫情错误信息的努力中吸取的经验教训：行为科学、数据科学和实施科学的敏捷整合方法的发展
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Feb 3;3:e40156. doi: 10.2196/40156. eCollection 2023.
4
Rapid Review on Publicly Available Datasets for Health Misinformation Detection.健康类错误信息检测公开数据集的快速综述
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 29;305:123-126. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230439.
5
Lessons for the UK on implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support: evidence syntheses and stakeholder engagement.英国在实施和评估母乳喂养支持方面的经验教训：证据综合和利益相关者参与。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(20):1-206. doi: 10.3310/DGTP5702.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响：一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架：差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
8
A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.对隐含与明确错误信息进行预先驳斥和驳斥干预的比较。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):591-607. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12551. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation.结合干预措施以减少病毒错误信息的传播。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;6(10):1372-1380. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01388-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
引用本文的文献
1
Nudge-based misinformation interventions are effective in information environments with low misinformation prevalence.基于推动的错误信息干预在错误信息流行率低的信息环境中是有效的。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 20;14(1):11495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62286-7.
本文引用的文献
1
Thinking clearly about misinformation.清晰思考错误信息。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jan 5;2(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00054-5.
2
Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation.解决言论自由和有害错误信息之间的内容审核困境。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 14;120(7):e2210666120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210666120. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
TikTok and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Media Content Quality.TikTok 与注意力缺陷多动障碍：社交媒体内容质量的横断面研究。
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;67(12):899-906. doi: 10.1177/07067437221082854. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.对隐含与明确错误信息进行预先驳斥和驳斥干预的比较。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):591-607. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12551. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
6
Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA.测量 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息对英国和美国疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Timing matters when correcting fake news.纠正假新闻要把握时机。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 2;118(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020043118.
8
Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools.公民与互联网：用认知工具应对数字挑战。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2020 Dec;21(3):103-156. doi: 10.1177/1529100620946707.
9
Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.纠正措施会向新受众传播错误信息吗？测试难以捉摸的熟悉度反向效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Aug 26;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6.
10
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.社交媒体上抗击 COVID-19 错误信息：可扩展的准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780. doi: 10.1177/0956797620939054. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Zotero 插件