• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于施特劳斯标准的左束支传导阻滞型心力衰竭的心脏再同步治疗

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure based on Strauss criteria for left bundle branch block.

作者信息

Saplaouras Athanasios, Vlachos Konstantinos, Mililis Panagiotis, Batsouli Athena, Bazoukis George, Xydonas Sotirios, Niarchou Panagioula, Frontera Antonio, Dragasis Stylianos, Kariki Ourania, Patsiotis Ilias G, Gkouziouta Aggeliki, Stachteas Panagiotis, Korantzopoulos Panagiotis, Tzeis Stylianos, Fragakis Nikolaos, Efremidis Michael, Letsas Konstantinos P

机构信息

Arrhythmia Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.

Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):174-184. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15028. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15028
PMID:39301852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11769622/
Abstract

AIMS

The left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a strong predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a significant number of patients do not respond to the treatment. The study sought to evaluate the impact of the stricter Strauss criteria for left bundle branch block (St-LBBB) on CRT response, hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events and mortality.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB admitted for CRT implantation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the fulfilment or not of St-LBBB criteria.

RESULTS

The study included 82 patients with ischaemic (ICM) and non-ischaemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy [46 (56%) with St-LBBB and 36 (44%) with non-St-LBBB]. Patients with St-LBBB showed higher CRT response rates compared with those with non-St-LBBB (P < 0.01), while the group with NICM exhibited the greatest benefit (P < 0.01). St-LBBB CRT responders displayed significantly lower rates of HF hospitalization (P < 0.0001) compared with the non-St-LBBB group. According to Kaplan-Meier time curves, this was primarily evident in patients with NICM (P < 0.0001). CRT responders displayed significantly fewer VA events (P < 0.001) and lower mortality rates (P < 0.0001) than non-responders. Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of VAs in NICM patients with St-LBBB (P = 0.049) compared with ICM patients with St-LBBB (P = 0.25). Lower mortality rates were observed in CRT responders than non-responders (P < 0.0001), with the group of NICM with St-LBBB criteria exhibiting the greatest benefit (P = 0.0238).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NICM and St-LBBB present the greatest benefit concerning CRT response, HF hospitalizations, VA events and mortality. Although St-LBBB criteria seem to improve patient selection for CRT, more data are needed to elucidate the role of St-LBBB criteria in this setting.

摘要

目的

左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)是心脏再同步治疗(CRT)反应的有力预测指标。然而,相当一部分患者对该治疗无反应。本研究旨在评估更严格的左束支传导阻滞施特劳斯标准(St-LBBB)对CRT反应、住院率、室性心律失常(VA)事件及死亡率的影响。

方法

本研究是对前瞻性收集的因CRT植入而入院的LBBB心力衰竭(HF)患者数据的回顾性分析。根据是否符合St-LBBB标准将患者分为两组。

结果

该研究纳入了82例缺血性心肌病(ICM)和非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者[46例(56%)符合St-LBBB标准,36例(44%)不符合St-LBBB标准]。与不符合St-LBBB标准的患者相比,符合St-LBBB标准的患者CRT反应率更高(P<0.01),而NICM组获益最大(P<0.01)。与不符合St-LBBB标准的组相比,符合St-LBBB标准的CRT反应者HF住院率显著更低(P<0.0001)。根据Kaplan-Meier时间曲线,这在NICM患者中最为明显(P<0.0001)。与无反应者相比,CRT反应者的VA事件显著更少(P<0.001),死亡率更低(P<0.0001)。Kaplan-Meier估计显示,与符合St-LBBB标准的ICM患者相比(P=0.25),符合St-LBBB标准 的NICM患者VA发生率显著更低(P=0.049)。CRT反应者的死亡率低于无反应者(P<0.0001),符合St-LBBB标准的NICM组获益最大(P=0.0238)。

结论

NICM且符合St-LBBB标准的患者在CRT反应、HF住院、VA事件及死亡率方面获益最大。尽管St-LBBB标准似乎能改善CRT患者的选择,但仍需要更多数据来阐明St-LBBB标准在此情况下的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/ee08017c7c98/EHF2-12-174-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/45769e16a5a2/EHF2-12-174-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/242c6c5cc7bf/EHF2-12-174-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/10db3ac1981f/EHF2-12-174-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/ee08017c7c98/EHF2-12-174-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/45769e16a5a2/EHF2-12-174-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/242c6c5cc7bf/EHF2-12-174-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/10db3ac1981f/EHF2-12-174-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5673/11769622/ee08017c7c98/EHF2-12-174-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure based on Strauss criteria for left bundle branch block.基于施特劳斯标准的左束支传导阻滞型心力衰竭的心脏再同步治疗
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):174-184. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15028. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.不同亚型真性左束支传导阻滞心力衰竭患者的心脏再同步治疗反应
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0363-x. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
Left ventricular dimensions predict risk of appropriate shocks but not mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients with left bundle-branch block and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.左心室维度可预测左束支传导阻滞和非缺血性心肌病的心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者的适当电击风险,但不能预测死亡率。
Europace. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1689-1694. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw323.
4
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy.PR 间期可预测非左束支传导阻滞患者的临床反应:多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗亚研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):645-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
New-onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction response to guideline-directed therapies: The NEOLITH study.新出现的左束支传导阻滞相关特发性非缺血性心肌病和左心室射血分数对指南指导治疗的反应:NEOLITH 研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):933-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.020. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支传导阻滞的定义影响心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
QRS axis and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure enrolled in MADIT-CRT.QRS 轴与心脏再同步治疗对轻度症状心力衰竭患者的获益:MADIT-CRT 研究
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12057. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
9
Left bundle branch block without a typical contraction pattern is associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.左束支传导阻滞且无典型收缩模式与心脏再同步治疗患者室性心律失常风险增加相关。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1843-1851. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02157-8. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
Immediate pharmacotherapy intensification after cardiac resynchronization therapy: incidence, characteristics, and impact.心脏再同步治疗后即刻药物治疗强化:发生率、特征和影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):1888-1899. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14737. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrocardiographic predictors of echocardiographic response in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Update of an old story.心电图预测心脏再同步治疗的超声心动图反应:旧故事的更新。
J Electrocardiol. 2022 Nov-Dec;75:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
The '10 commandments' for the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 7;42(42):4295. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab699.
3
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
4
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy and ventricular tachyarrhythmia burden.心脏再同步治疗与室性心律失常负荷
Heart Rhythm. 2021 May;18(5):762-769. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.12.034. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Implantation Strategy for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Patients: The ENHANCE CRT Study.非左束支传导阻滞患者的靶向左心室导线植入策略:ENHANCE CRT研究
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;6(9):1171-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
7
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS focused update to 2015 expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.2019 年 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS 对 2015 年最佳植入式心脏复律除颤器编程和测试专家共识声明的重点更新。
Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1442-1443. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz065.
8
Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Use of strict left bundle branch block criteria.预测心脏再同步治疗的反应:严格左束支传导阻滞标准的应用。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;42(4):431-438. doi: 10.1111/pace.13638. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Rationale and design for ENHANCE CRT: QLV implant strategy for non-left bundle branch block patients.ENHANCE CRT:非左束支传导阻滞患者的 QLV 植入策略的理由和设计。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1184-1190. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12340. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支传导阻滞的定义影响心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060. Epub 2018 Jul 17.