Suppr超能文献

带骨块与不带骨块的股四头肌肌腱前交叉韧带重建术在临床疗效上无差异:来自丹麦膝关节韧带注册中心的结果。

No difference in clinical outcome between quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without bone block: Results from the Danish Knee Ligament Registry.

作者信息

Lind Martin, Nielsen Torsten

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 May;33(5):1579-1585. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12451. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The quadriceps tendon (QT) has recently gained increasing interest as an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) graft due to minimally invasive harvesting techniques and low donor site morbidity. QT grafts can be used both with a patella bone block and as complete soft tissue grafts. However, it is unknown whether the QT graft type affects clinical outcomes. This study used data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR) to compare revision rates, knee stability and subjective clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ACLR with QT graft with bone block (QT-B) or soft tissue only (QT-S).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with QT autografts documented in the DKRR were included and divided into the QT-B (n = 925) and QT-S (n = 659) groups. The clinical outcome was evaluated using objective-instrumented knee stability, pivot shift test, knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and Tegner activity scores for the two cohorts performed at the 1-year follow-up. The overall revision rates were determined as well.

RESULTS

Revision rates at 2 years were equally low in both graft groups at 2.8%. Similarly, post-operative knee laxity was equal at 1.5 (1.4) and 1.6 (1.4) mm side-to-side laxity, respectively. However, QT-B exhibited a reduced post-operative positive pivot shift of 22% compared with 31% for QT-S. Although the subjective outcomes were equal for the KOOS and Tegner activity scale scores at the 1-year follow-up, reduced improvements in KOOS were observed for QT-B compared to QT-S.

CONCLUSION

ACL with a QT autograft harvested either with a bone block or as a soft tissue graft exhibited comparable revision rates and sagittal knee stability. Furthermore, ACL reconstruction using a QT graft with a bone block achieved better rotational stability with less pivot shift than ACL reconstruction using complete soft tissue QT grafts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

目的

由于微创采集技术和较低的供区并发症,股四头肌肌腱(QT)作为前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)移植物近来受到越来越多的关注。QT移植物既可以与髌骨骨块一起使用,也可以作为完整的软组织移植物使用。然而,QT移植物类型是否会影响临床结果尚不清楚。本研究使用丹麦膝关节韧带重建登记处(DKRR)的数据,比较接受带骨块QT移植物(QT-B)或仅软组织QT移植物(QT-S)的ACLR患者的翻修率、膝关节稳定性和主观临床结果。

方法

纳入在DKRR中记录的接受QT自体移植物进行初次ACL重建的患者,并分为QT-B组(n = 925)和QT-S组(n = 659)。在1年随访时,使用客观仪器测量的膝关节稳定性、轴移试验、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)以及Tegner活动评分对两组的临床结果进行评估。还确定了总体翻修率。

结果

两组移植物在2年时的翻修率均同样低,为2.8%。同样,术后膝关节侧方松弛度分别为1.5(1.4)和1.6(1.4)mm,二者相等。然而,QT-B术后阳性轴移减少了22%,而QT-S为31%。虽然在1年随访时KOOS和Tegner活动量表评分的主观结果相等,但与QT-S相比,QT-B的KOOS改善程度降低。

结论

采用带骨块或软组织的QT自体移植物进行ACLR,其翻修率和矢状面膝关节稳定性相当。此外,与使用完整软组织QT移植物进行ACLR相比,使用带骨块QT移植物进行ACLR可获得更好的旋转稳定性,轴移更少。

证据水平

三级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37f/12022824/7ea71ecb5e75/KSA-33-1579-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验