Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;54(3):183-187. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101000. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
We performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using either quadriceps tendon graft (QT) or semitendinosus/gracilis hamstring (STG) graft. We compared subjective outcome (primary outcome) and knee stability, donor site morbidity and function (secondary outcomes).
From 2013 to 2015, we included 99 adults with isolated ACL injuries in the RCT. Fifty patients were randomised to QT grafts and 49 to STG grafts and followed for 2 years. Patient evaluated outcomes were performed by subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Kujala and Tegner activity scores. Knee laxity was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Donor site morbidity was evaluated by the 'donor site-related functional problems following ACLR score'. One-leg hop test tested limp strength symmetry.
At 2-year follow-up, there was no difference between the two graft groups regarding subjective patient outcome, knee stability and reoperations. Also, at 2 years, donor site symptoms were present in 27% of patients in the QT group and 50% of patients in the STG group. The donor site morbidity score was 14 and 22 for the QT and STG, respectively. Hop test demonstrated lower limp symmetry for QT graft than STG graft of 91% and 97% respectively.
QT graft for ACLR did not result in inferior subjective outcome compared with STG graft. However, QT graft was associated with lower donor site morbidity than STG grafts but resulted in more quadriceps muscle strength deficiency than hamstring grafts. Both graft types had similar knee stability outcome.
NCT02173483.
我们对接受前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的患者进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),比较了使用四头肌腱移植物(QT)或半腱肌/股薄肌肌腱移植物(STG)的主观结果(主要结局)和膝关节稳定性、供体部位发病率和功能(次要结局)。
2013 年至 2015 年,我们将 99 例 ACL 损伤的成年人纳入 RCT。50 例患者随机分为 QT 移植物组,49 例患者分为 STG 移植物组,并随访 2 年。采用国际膝关节文献委员会主观评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎评分、Kujala 和 Tegner 活动评分对患者进行评估。使用 KT-1000 关节测量仪测量膝关节松弛度。采用“ACL 重建后供体部位相关功能问题评分”评估供体部位发病率。单腿跳跃试验测试跛行力量的对称性。
在 2 年随访时,两组患者在主观患者结局、膝关节稳定性和再手术方面无差异。此外,在 2 年时,QT 组有 27%的患者和 STG 组有 50%的患者存在供体部位症状。QT 组和 STG 组的供体部位发病率评分分别为 14 分和 22 分。跳跃试验显示,QT 移植物的跛行对称性比 STG 移植物低,分别为 91%和 97%。
与 STG 移植物相比,QT 移植物用于 ACLR 并不会导致较差的主观结果。然而,QT 移植物的供体部位发病率低于 STG 移植物,但导致股四头肌力量不足的程度高于腘绳肌移植物。两种移植物类型的膝关节稳定性结果相似。
NCT02173483。