Suppr超能文献

在初次前交叉韧带重建术后,四股半腱肌或半腱肌/股薄肌移植物在翻修率、膝关节稳定性及患者报告结局方面无差异。

No differences between 4-strand semitendinosus or semitendinosus/gracilis grafts in revision rates, knee stability and patient-reported outcomes after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

作者信息

Nielsen Torsten Grønbech, Lind Martin

机构信息

Division of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.

Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 4;12(2):e70232. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70232. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare revision rates, knee stability and patient-reported outcomes in a national cohort of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed patients using either the semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G) or the 4-strand semitendinosus (4-ST) grafts.

METHODS

ACL reconstructed patients operated from 2015 to 2021 who met the following criteria: minimum 2-year follow-up and isolated ACL with either ST/G or 4-ST grafts. The primary outcome was ACL revision surgery assessed at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were knee laxity (side-to-side difference) and pivot shift (rotational stability difference-Grade 0 or Grade 1-3), and patient-reported outcomes; Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and Tegner activity scale assessed at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 6750 ST/G and 1321 4-ST patients were included in the study. There was no statistical difference in 2-year revision rates between the groups (ST/G; 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-2.07), 4-ST; 1.40 (95%CI 0.88-2.21)). A small significant but not clinically relevant difference was seen in knee laxity (1.27 mm vs. 1.13 mm), but no other significant differences were seen in pivot shift or patient-reported outcomes at one year. Both groups showed significant improvement from baseline to 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The present study found no difference between ST/G or 4-ST in ACL reconstruction patients regarding revision rates, knee laxity and patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在一个全国性队列中,使用半腱肌/股薄肌(ST/G)或四股半腱肌(4-ST)移植物进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的患者的翻修率、膝关节稳定性和患者报告的结果。

方法

2015年至2021年接受ACL重建手术且符合以下标准的患者:至少2年随访且单纯ACL损伤,使用ST/G或4-ST移植物。主要结局是在2年随访时评估的ACL翻修手术。次要结局包括膝关节松弛度(两侧差异)和轴移试验(旋转稳定性差异 - 0级或1 - 3级),以及患者报告的结果;在1年随访时评估的膝关节骨关节炎与疗效评分(KOOS)子量表和泰格纳活动量表。

结果

本研究共纳入6750例使用ST/G移植物和1321例使用4-ST移植物的患者。两组之间的2年翻修率无统计学差异(ST/G组为1.73(95%置信区间[CI] 1.44 - 2.07),4-ST组为1.40(95%CI 0.88 - 2.21))。膝关节松弛度存在微小但无临床意义的显著差异(1.27毫米对1.13毫米),但在1年时轴移试验或患者报告的结果方面未发现其他显著差异。两组从基线到1年均显示出显著改善。

结论

本研究发现,在ACL重建患者中,ST/G和4-ST在翻修率、膝关节松弛度和患者报告的结果方面没有差异。

证据水平

三级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb25/11970528/2eae66765d49/JEO2-12-e70232-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验