Brechko Amanda, Jiroutek Michael R, Jones Kyla, Brenseke Bonnie, Maharty Donald C, Cappola James, Holly Stephen P
Campbell University.
College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University.
N C Med J. 2023 Mar;84(2):127-133. doi: 10.18043/001c.73024.
Some patients with COVID-19 develop life-threatening thrombotic complications including myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and ischemic stroke. These inflammatory and hypercoagulable states have been well documented in patient cohorts from metropolitan areas, but not in more rural populations, nor has a data-driven treatment plan been developed for thrombotic COVID-19 patients.
We undertook a retrospective case-control study of COVID-19-positive patients to analyze the impact of thrombosis on various clinical endpoints including terminal diagnosis and disease severity. Prevalence and impact of thrombosis were determined using medical records from 2237 COVID-19-positive patients hospitalized in Cumberland County, North Carolina. Odds ratios for terminal diagnosis, death, ICU admission, and ventilation were calculated based on thrombosis status, D-dimer level, or type of antithrombotic treatment.
Terminal diagnosis [OR 1.81; 95% CI (1.10, 2.98)], ICU admission [2.25; (1.33, 3.81)], and ventilation [2.46; (1.45, 4.18)] were all more likely in thrombotic patients (N = 97) compared to nonthrombotic patients (N = 2140) after adjusting for age. D-dimer levels were associated with death overall, but not among thrombotic patients. Treatments that combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs appeared to be more efficacious than anticoagulants alone in preventing death and severe disease.
Patient medical history prior to hospitalization was not evaluated.
In this cohort, those with thrombosis are at increased risk for adverse outcomes including death and severe disease. Antithrombotic therapy that includes antiplatelet drugs provides improved outcomes. Higher-powered prospective trials will be necessary to confirm any potential merits of antiplatelet therapy.
一些新冠肺炎患者会出现危及生命的血栓形成并发症,包括心肌梗死、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、弥散性血管内凝血和缺血性中风。这些炎症和高凝状态在大城市地区的患者队列中已有充分记录,但在农村人口中未见报道,也未针对血栓形成的新冠肺炎患者制定数据驱动的治疗方案。
我们对新冠肺炎阳性患者进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,以分析血栓形成对各种临床终点的影响,包括最终诊断和疾病严重程度。使用北卡罗来纳州坎伯兰县2237名住院的新冠肺炎阳性患者的病历确定血栓形成的患病率和影响。根据血栓形成状态、D-二聚体水平或抗血栓治疗类型计算最终诊断、死亡、入住重症监护病房和通气的比值比。
在调整年龄后,与非血栓形成患者(N = 2140)相比,血栓形成患者(N = 97)的最终诊断[比值比1.81;95%置信区间(1.10,2.98)]、入住重症监护病房[2.25;(1.33,3.81)]和通气[2.46;(1.45,4.18)]的可能性均更高。D-二聚体水平总体上与死亡相关,但在血栓形成患者中并非如此。联合使用抗血小板和抗凝药物的治疗在预防死亡和严重疾病方面似乎比单独使用抗凝药物更有效。
未评估患者住院前的病史。
在该队列中,血栓形成患者出现包括死亡和严重疾病在内的不良结局的风险增加。包括抗血小板药物在内的抗血栓治疗可改善结局。需要更高效能的前瞻性试验来证实抗血小板治疗的任何潜在益处。