Suppr超能文献

女性参与情况以及特定性别的报告做法在预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的复方制剂随机对照试验中的研究:一项系统评价的二次分析

Female participation, and sex-specific reporting practices, in polypill randomised controlled trials in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of a systematic review.

作者信息

Peters Sanne A E, Rodgers Anthony, Patel Anushka, Norton Robyn, Huffman Mark D, Agarwal Anubha

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Sep 20. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae307.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The polypill is an emerging strategy for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the participation of females in randomised controlled trials evaluating polypills for prevention of cardiovascular disease and subsequent sex-specific analyses and reporting.

METHODS

Cardiovascular polypill trials were identified through a systematic review. Data were extracted on the use of sex-specific eligibility criteria, female participation, and the conduct, findings, and interpretation of sex-specific analyses.

RESULTS

Of 26 trials included, 12 (46%) excluded groups of females, mainly if pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential. Female participation ranged from 10% to 73% across trials. Overall, 42% of included participants were female. Of 18 trials conducted in a mostly primary prevention population, females represented 49% of trial participants. In mixed or exclusively secondary prevention trials (n=8), females represented 26% of trial participants. Females represented 46% of trial participants in trials that excluded groups of females (n=12). In trials without explicit exclusion criteria (n=13), females represented 32% of trial participants. Nine out of 26 trials reported sex-stratified analyses (35% of trials; 70% of all participants). Of these, two found some evidence for possible sex differences, both reporting larger blood pressure effects in females than males. Four trials provided sex considerations in the discussion section of the report.

CONCLUSION

The participation of females in cardiovascular polypill trials is substantially higher in primary prevention trials as compared to trials conducted in mixed or exclusively secondary prevention populations. The use of sex-specific eligibility criteria was not linked to lower female participation. Sex-specific reporting is sparsely conducted, although most frequent in larger trials.

摘要

背景

多效药丸是预防和管理心血管疾病的一种新兴策略。我们评估了女性参与评估多效药丸预防心血管疾病的随机对照试验情况,以及随后的性别特异性分析和报告情况。

方法

通过系统评价确定心血管多效药丸试验。提取了关于使用性别特异性纳入标准、女性参与情况以及性别特异性分析的实施、结果和解读的数据。

结果

在纳入的26项试验中,12项(46%)排除了女性群体,主要是怀孕、哺乳期或有生育潜力的女性。各试验中女性参与率从10%到73%不等。总体而言,纳入的参与者中有42%为女性。在主要针对一级预防人群开展的18项试验中,女性占试验参与者的49%。在混合或单纯二级预防试验(n = 8)中,女性占试验参与者的26%。在排除女性群体的试验(n = 12)中,女性占试验参与者的46%。在没有明确排除标准的试验(n = 13)中,女性占试验参与者的32%。26项试验中有9项报告了性别分层分析(占试验的35%;占所有参与者的70%)。其中,两项发现了一些可能存在性别差异的证据,均报告女性的血压效应大于男性。四项试验在报告的讨论部分考虑了性别因素。

结论

与在混合或单纯二级预防人群中开展的试验相比,女性在一级预防试验中参与心血管多效药丸试验的比例要高得多。使用性别特异性纳入标准与女性参与率较低并无关联。性别特异性报告开展较少,尽管在规模较大的试验中最为常见。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验