Pridham Karen, Brown Roger, Schardt Dana, Kneeland Tondi, Fedderly Raymond
University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA
University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA.
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2024 Sep 20. doi: 10.1891/RTNP-2023-0128.
The purpose of this secondary analysis, from a pilot randomized controlled trial of guided participation (GP), was to describe patterns of coparenting for mother and father dyads caring for an infant with complex congenital heart disease and to examine the influencing factors at infant age 6 months. Our theoretical framework included GP treatment, severity of neonatal illness (severity), coparenting pattern, and parent attention to infant weight gain (weight gain). From transcribed interviews with 25 parent dyads at infant age 2 and 6 months, data relevant to coparenting were categorized for entry into a matrix table. These categories included family circumstances; infant health status, feeding, and sleeping; and how the parents worked in relation to each other for caregiving, the caregiving issues they were working on, and their caregiving goals. The tabled data showed two coparenting patterns, collaborative and cooperative, with very little change from 2 to 6 months, and 6-month weight gain mention. We used Bayesian sensitivity network analysis to examine, at 6 months, GP effect in contrast to usual care (control group) effect and the effect of higher or lower severity on coparenting pattern and weight gain. The treatment group had greater percentage of collaborative coparenting pattern with higher severity. In contrast, the control group showed the percentage of dyads with a collaborative coparenting pattern was similar for higher and lower severity. Weight gain mention was higher with higher severity. Further coparenting pattern identification and study replication with a larger, diversified sample is planned.
这项二次分析源自一项引导式参与(GP)的试点随机对照试验,其目的是描述照顾患有复杂先天性心脏病婴儿的父母二元组的共同养育模式,并研究婴儿6个月大时的影响因素。我们的理论框架包括GP治疗、新生儿疾病严重程度(严重程度)、共同养育模式以及父母对婴儿体重增加的关注(体重增加)。通过对25个父母二元组在婴儿2个月和6个月大时的访谈记录进行分析,与共同养育相关的数据被分类整理,录入一个矩阵表。这些类别包括家庭情况;婴儿健康状况、喂养和睡眠;以及父母在照顾方面如何相互协作、他们正在处理的照顾问题以及他们的照顾目标。表格数据显示了两种共同养育模式,即协作型和合作型,从2个月到6个月变化很小,并且提到了6个月时的体重增加情况。我们使用贝叶斯敏感性网络分析来研究在6个月时,与常规护理(对照组)效果相比,GP的效果,以及更高或更低严重程度对共同养育模式和体重增加的影响。治疗组中更高严重程度下协作型共同养育模式的比例更高。相比之下,对照组显示,无论严重程度高低,具有协作型共同养育模式的二元组比例相似。严重程度越高,提及体重增加的情况越多。计划进一步进行共同养育模式识别,并使用更大、更多样化的样本重复该研究。