• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多维名义反应模型对问卷数据中的伪造进行建模:项目期望特征的重要性。

Using the multidimensional nominal response model to model faking in questionnaire data: The importance of item desirability characteristics.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, L13, 15-17 - room 515, 68161, Mannheim, Germany.

University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8869-8896. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02509-x. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02509-x
PMID:39304600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525249/
Abstract

Faking in self-report personality questionnaires describes a deliberate response distortion aimed at presenting oneself in an overly favorable manner. Unless the influence of faking on item responses is taken into account, faking can harm multiple psychometric properties of a test. In the present article, we account for faking using an extension of the multidimensional nominal response model (MNRM), which is an item response theory (IRT) model that offers a flexible framework for modeling different kinds of response biases. Particularly, we investigated under which circumstances the MNRM can adequately adjust substantive trait scores and latent correlations for the influence of faking and examined the role of variation in the way item content is related to social desirability (i.e., item desirability characteristics) in facilitating the modeling of faking and counteracting its detrimental effects. Using a simulation, we found that the inclusion of a faking dimension in the model can overall improve the recovery of substantive trait person parameters and latent correlations between substantive traits, especially when the impact of faking in the data is high. Item desirability characteristics moderated the effect of modeling faking and were themselves associated with different levels of parameter recovery. In an empirical demonstration with N = 1070 test-takers, we also showed that the faking modeling approach in combination with different item desirability characteristics can prove successful in empirical questionnaire data. We end the article with a discussion of implications for psychological assessment.

摘要

自陈式人格问卷中的伪造描述的是一种蓄意的反应扭曲,旨在以过于有利的方式呈现自己。除非考虑到伪造对项目反应的影响,否则伪造会损害测试的多个心理计量特性。在本文中,我们使用多维名义反应模型(MNRM)的扩展来解释伪造,该模型是一种项目反应理论(IRT)模型,为建模不同类型的反应偏差提供了灵活的框架。特别是,我们研究了在何种情况下,MNRM 可以充分调整伪造对实质性特质分数和潜在相关性的影响,并考察了项目内容与社会期望性(即项目期望特征)之间的关系变化在促进伪造建模和抵消其不利影响方面的作用。通过模拟,我们发现,在模型中包含伪造维度通常可以改善实质性特质个体参数和实质性特质之间潜在相关性的恢复,尤其是当数据中伪造的影响较高时。项目期望特征调节了伪造建模的效果,并且它们本身与不同水平的参数恢复有关。在对 N = 1070 名应试者的实证示范中,我们还表明,伪造建模方法与不同的项目期望特征相结合,可以在实证问卷数据中取得成功。最后,我们讨论了对心理评估的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/d32fdf804d5b/13428_2024_2509_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/12a244f13708/13428_2024_2509_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/9f68d76a0662/13428_2024_2509_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/918b7dbacd61/13428_2024_2509_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/00b5d056b1b7/13428_2024_2509_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/e25a58fe809f/13428_2024_2509_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/d32fdf804d5b/13428_2024_2509_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/12a244f13708/13428_2024_2509_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/9f68d76a0662/13428_2024_2509_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/918b7dbacd61/13428_2024_2509_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/00b5d056b1b7/13428_2024_2509_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/e25a58fe809f/13428_2024_2509_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/472e/11525249/d32fdf804d5b/13428_2024_2509_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the multidimensional nominal response model to model faking in questionnaire data: The importance of item desirability characteristics.使用多维名义反应模型对问卷数据中的伪造进行建模:项目期望特征的重要性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8869-8896. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02509-x. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
"What If Applicants Fake Their Responses?": Modeling Faking and Response Styles in High-Stakes Assessments Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.“如果申请人伪造他们的回答会怎样?”:使用多维名义反应模型对高风险评估中的伪造和反应风格进行建模。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 23:00131644241307560. doi: 10.1177/00131644241307560.
3
Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.多维迫选格式中的伪装建模:伪装混合模型。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):773-794. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09818-6. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.自我报告式人格测试中伪装行为的校正
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Oct;56(5):582-91. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12231. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
5
The nature of faking: A homogeneous and predictable construct?伪装的本质:一种同质且可预测的结构?
Psychol Assess. 2019 Apr;31(4):532-544. doi: 10.1037/pas0000619. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
6
Does multidimensional forced-choice prevent faking? Comparing the susceptibility of the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format to faking.多维迫选是否能防止伪装?比较多维迫选格式和评分量表格式对伪装的敏感性。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Feb;33(2):156-170. doi: 10.1037/pas0000971. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
7
The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.项目顺序对评估高潜力人才时故意反应失真的影响:评估试点申请人。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Apr;49(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12015. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
8
Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.效度量表为理想反应的平衡量表:二分法与多分法传统和IRT 评分。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):878-91. doi: 10.1037/a0036430. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
9
Intermittent faking of personality profiles in high-stakes assessments: A grade of membership analysis.高风险评估中的人格特征间歇性伪造:隶属度等级分析。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):895-916. doi: 10.1037/met0000295. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.千真万确?伪装对横交模型有效性的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0258603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258603. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling Qualitatively Different Faking Strategies in High-Stakes Personality Assessments: A Mixture Extension of the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.解析高风险人格评估中性质不同的伪装策略:多维名义反应模型的混合扩展
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 29:00131644251341843. doi: 10.1177/00131644251341843.

本文引用的文献

1
Separation of Traits and Extreme Response Style in IRTree Models: The Role of Mimicry Effects for the Meaningful Interpretation of Estimates.IRTree模型中特质与极端反应风格的分离:模仿效应在估计值有意义解释中的作用。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):927-956. doi: 10.1177/00131644231213319. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
On the Utility of Indirect Methods for Detecting Faking.论间接方法在检测伪装方面的效用。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):841-868. doi: 10.1177/00131644231209520. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Unipolar IRT and the Author Recognition Test (ART).
单极 IRT 和作者识别测试(ART)。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5406-5423. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02275-2. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
4
Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity.求职情境中对人格的低评价性测量:对社会赞许性反应及效标效度的影响
J Pers Assess. 2024 May-Jun;106(3):372-383. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2251158. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Intermittent faking of personality profiles in high-stakes assessments: A grade of membership analysis.高风险评估中的人格特征间歇性伪造:隶属度等级分析。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):895-916. doi: 10.1037/met0000295. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration.在总分相除项目反应理论模型中对反应风格进行建模的不同方法(第1部分):模型整合
Psychol Methods. 2020 Oct;25(5):560-576. doi: 10.1037/met0000249.
7
Estimation of Response Styles Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model: A Tutorial and Comparison With Sum Scores.使用多维名义反应模型估计反应风格:教程及与总分的比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 6;11:72. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00072. eCollection 2020.
8
A Social Desirability Item Response Theory Model: Retrieve-Deceive-Transfer.一个社会期望项目反应理论模型:检索-欺骗-转移。
Psychometrika. 2020 Mar;85(1):56-74. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09689-y. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
9
Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.强迫是否会减少伪装?高风险情境下迫选人格测验的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1347-1368. doi: 10.1037/apl0000414. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
True virtue, self-presentation, or both?: A behavioral test of impression management and overclaiming.真正的美德、自我表现还是两者兼有?:印象管理和夸大其词的行为测试。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Feb;31(2):181-191. doi: 10.1037/pas0000657. Epub 2018 Oct 8.