• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析高风险人格评估中性质不同的伪装策略:多维名义反应模型的混合扩展

Disentangling Qualitatively Different Faking Strategies in High-Stakes Personality Assessments: A Mixture Extension of the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.

作者信息

Seitz Timo, Alagöz Ö Emre C, Meiser Thorsten

机构信息

University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 29:00131644251341843. doi: 10.1177/00131644251341843.

DOI:10.1177/00131644251341843
PMID:40756699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310618/
Abstract

High-stakes personality assessments are often compromised by faking, where test-takers distort their responses according to social desirability. Many previous models have accounted for faking by modeling an additional latent dimension that quantifies each test-taker's degree of faking. Such models assume a homogeneous response strategy among all test-takers, reflected in a measurement model in which substantive traits and faking jointly influence item responses. However, such a model will be misspecified if, for some test-takers, item responding is only a function of substantive traits or only a function of faking. To address this limitation, we propose a mixture modeling extension of the multidimensional nominal response model (M-MNRM) that can be used to account for qualitatively different response strategies and to model relationships of strategy use with external variables. In a simulation study, the M-MNRM exhibited good parameter recovery and high classification accuracy across multiple conditions. Analyses of three empirical high-stakes datasets provided evidence for the consistent presence of the specified latent classes in different personnel selection contexts, emphasizing the importance of accounting for such kind of response behavior heterogeneity in high-stakes assessment data. We end the article with a discussion of the model's utility for psychological measurement.

摘要

高风险人格评估常常因应试者根据社会期望歪曲回答而受到影响。许多先前的模型通过构建一个额外的潜在维度来量化每个应试者的伪装程度,以此来考虑伪装因素。这些模型假定所有应试者的反应策略是一致的,这在一个测量模型中有所体现,即实质性特质和伪装共同影响项目反应。然而,如果对于某些应试者而言,项目反应仅是实质性特质的函数或者仅是伪装的函数,那么这样的模型就会被错误设定。为解决这一局限性,我们提出了多维名义反应模型(M-MNRM)的混合建模扩展,它可用于解释质上不同的反应策略,并对策略使用与外部变量之间的关系进行建模。在一项模拟研究中,M-MNRM在多种条件下都表现出良好的参数恢复能力和较高的分类准确率。对三个实证高风险数据集的分析为在不同人员选拔背景下一致存在特定潜在类别提供了证据,强调了在高风险评估数据中考虑这种反应行为异质性的重要性。我们在文章结尾讨论了该模型在心理测量中的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/478089864f20/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/085f76d5cd42/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/9622109029de/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/2c5527ab7b16/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/2a606779c964/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/478089864f20/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/085f76d5cd42/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/9622109029de/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/2c5527ab7b16/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/2a606779c964/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949b/12310618/478089864f20/10.1177_00131644251341843-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Disentangling Qualitatively Different Faking Strategies in High-Stakes Personality Assessments: A Mixture Extension of the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.解析高风险人格评估中性质不同的伪装策略:多维名义反应模型的混合扩展
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 29:00131644251341843. doi: 10.1177/00131644251341843.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
"What If Applicants Fake Their Responses?": Modeling Faking and Response Styles in High-Stakes Assessments Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.“如果申请人伪造他们的回答会怎样?”:使用多维名义反应模型对高风险评估中的伪造和反应风格进行建模。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 23:00131644241307560. doi: 10.1177/00131644241307560.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people.老年人即将发生和当前失水脱水的识别的临床症状、体征及检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;2015(4):CD009647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009647.pub2.
10
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling individual differences in cognitive response mechanisms for rating scale items: A flexible-mixture multidimensional IRTree approach.剖析评定量表项目认知反应机制中的个体差异:一种灵活混合的多维IRT树方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 13;57(9):256. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02778-0.

本文引用的文献

1
"What If Applicants Fake Their Responses?": Modeling Faking and Response Styles in High-Stakes Assessments Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.“如果申请人伪造他们的回答会怎样?”:使用多维名义反应模型对高风险评估中的伪造和反应风格进行建模。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 23:00131644241307560. doi: 10.1177/00131644241307560.
2
A comparison of the response-pattern-based faking detection methods.基于反应模式的伪装检测方法比较
J Appl Psychol. 2025 Aug;110(8):1015-1035. doi: 10.1037/apl0001261. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
3
On the Utility of Indirect Methods for Detecting Faking.
论间接方法在检测伪装方面的效用。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):841-868. doi: 10.1177/00131644231209520. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Investigating Heterogeneity in Response Strategies: A Mixture Multidimensional IRTree Approach.探究反应策略中的异质性:一种混合多维IRT树方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):957-993. doi: 10.1177/00131644231206765. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
Using the multidimensional nominal response model to model faking in questionnaire data: The importance of item desirability characteristics.使用多维名义反应模型对问卷数据中的伪造进行建模:项目期望特征的重要性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8869-8896. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02509-x. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Intermittent faking of personality profiles in high-stakes assessments: A grade of membership analysis.高风险评估中的人格特征间歇性伪造:隶属度等级分析。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):895-916. doi: 10.1037/met0000295. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.基于反应时间的潜在反应混合模型在调查数据中识别和建模粗心及不充分努力反应
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):593-619. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
8
A Mixture IRTree Model for Extreme Response Style: Accounting for Response Process Uncertainty.一种用于极端反应风格的混合IRT树模型:考虑反应过程的不确定性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):131-154. doi: 10.1177/0013164420913915. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Does multidimensional forced-choice prevent faking? Comparing the susceptibility of the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format to faking.多维迫选是否能防止伪装?比较多维迫选格式和评分量表格式对伪装的敏感性。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Feb;33(2):156-170. doi: 10.1037/pas0000971. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration.在总分相除项目反应理论模型中对反应风格进行建模的不同方法(第1部分):模型整合
Psychol Methods. 2020 Oct;25(5):560-576. doi: 10.1037/met0000249.