Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Centre for Medical Evidence, Decision Integrity & Clinical Impact (MEDICI), Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Med Decis Making. 2024 Oct;44(7):742-755. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241280611. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
Infectious disease (ID) models have been the backbone of policy decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, models often overlook variation in disease risk, health burden, and policy impact across social groups. Nonetheless, social determinants are becoming increasingly recognized as fundamental to the success of control strategies overall and to the mitigation of disparities.
To underscore the importance of considering social heterogeneity in epidemiological modeling, we systematically reviewed ID modeling guidelines to identify reasons and recommendations for incorporating social determinants of health into models in relation to the conceptualization, implementation, and interpretations of models.
After identifying 1,372 citations, we found 19 guidelines, of which 14 directly referenced at least 1 social determinant. Age ( = 11), sex and gender ( = 5), and socioeconomic status ( = 5) were the most commonly discussed social determinants. Specific recommendations were identified to consider social determinants to 1) improve the predictive accuracy of models, 2) understand heterogeneity of disease burden and policy impact, 3) contextualize decision making, 4) address inequalities, and 5) assess implementation challenges.
This study can support modelers and policy makers in taking into account social heterogeneity, to consider the distributional impact of infectious disease outbreaks across social groups as well as to tailor approaches to improve equitable access to prevention, diagnostics, and therapeutics.
Infectious disease (ID) models often overlook the role of social determinants of health (SDH) in understanding variation in disease risk, health burden, and policy impact across social groups.In this study, we systematically review ID guidelines and identify key areas to consider SDH in relation to the conceptualization, implementation, and interpretations of models.We identify specific recommendations to consider SDH to improve model accuracy, understand heterogeneity, estimate policy impact, address inequalities, and assess implementation challenges.
传染病(ID)模型一直是 COVID-19 大流行期间政策决策的基础。然而,模型往往忽略了疾病风险、健康负担和政策影响在社会群体之间的差异。尽管如此,社会决定因素越来越被认为是控制策略总体成功以及减少差异的基础。
为了强调在流行病学建模中考虑社会异质性的重要性,我们系统地审查了 ID 建模指南,以确定将健康的社会决定因素纳入模型的原因和建议,涉及模型的概念化、实施和解释。
在确定了 1372 条引文后,我们找到了 19 条指南,其中 14 条直接提到了至少 1 个社会决定因素。年龄( = 11)、性别和性别( = 5)和社会经济地位( = 5)是最常讨论的社会决定因素。确定了具体建议,以考虑社会决定因素:1)提高模型的预测准确性,2)了解疾病负担和政策影响的异质性,3)使决策背景化,4)解决不平等问题,5)评估实施挑战。
本研究可以支持建模者和决策者考虑社会异质性,考虑传染病暴发在社会群体中的分布影响,以及调整方法以改善预防、诊断和治疗的公平获取。
传染病(ID)模型往往忽略了健康的社会决定因素(SDH)在理解疾病风险、健康负担和政策影响在社会群体之间的差异方面的作用。在这项研究中,我们系统地审查了 ID 指南,并确定了在模型的概念化、实施和解释方面考虑 SDH 的关键领域。我们确定了具体的建议,以考虑 SDH 来提高模型的准确性、理解异质性、估计政策影响、解决不平等问题和评估实施挑战。