Johnson Karl, Biddell Caitlin B, Hassmiller Lich Kristen, Swann Julie, Delamater Paul, Mayorga Maria, Ivy Julie, Smith Raymond L, Patel Mehul D
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Jul 29;7(2):23814683221116362. doi: 10.1177/23814683221116362. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
The COVID-19 pandemic has popularized computer-based decision-support models, which are commonly used to inform decision making amidst complexity. Understanding what organizational decision makers prefer from these models is needed to inform model development during this and future crises. We recruited and interviewed decision makers from North Carolina across 9 sectors to understand organizational decision-making processes during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic ( = 44). For this study, we identified and analyzed a subset of responses from interviewees ( = 19) who reported using modeling to inform decision making. We used conventional content analysis to analyze themes from this convenience sample with respect to the source of models and their applications, the value of modeling and recommended applications, and hesitancies toward the use of models. Models were used to compare trends in disease spread across localities, estimate the effects of social distancing policies, and allocate scarce resources, with some interviewees depending on multiple models. Decision makers desired more granular models, capable of projecting disease spread within subpopulations and estimating where local outbreaks could occur, and incorporating a broad set of outcomes, such as social well-being. Hesitancies to the use of modeling included doubts that models could reflect nuances of human behavior, concerns about the quality of data used in models, and the limited amount of modeling specific to the local context. Decision makers perceived modeling as valuable for informing organizational decisions yet described varied ability and willingness to use models for this purpose. These data present an opportunity to educate organizational decision makers on the merits of decision-support modeling and to inform modeling teams on how to build more responsive models that address the needs of organizational decision makers.
Organizations from a diversity of sectors across North Carolina (including public health, education, business, government, religion, and public safety) have used decision-support modeling to inform decision making during COVID-19.Decision makers wish for models to project the spread of disease, especially at the local level (e.g., individual cities and counties), and to help estimate the outcomes of policies.Some organizational decision makers are hesitant to use modeling to inform their decisions, stemming from doubts that models could reflect nuances of human behavior, concerns about the accuracy and precision of data used in models, and the limited amount of modeling available at the local level.
新冠疫情使基于计算机的决策支持模型得到广泛应用,这些模型常用于在复杂情况下为决策提供信息。要在当前及未来危机期间为模型开发提供信息,就需要了解组织决策者对这些模型的偏好。我们招募并采访了北卡罗来纳州9个部门的决策者,以了解新冠疫情第一年(n = 44)期间的组织决策过程。在本研究中,我们识别并分析了受访者(n = 19)中报告使用模型为决策提供信息的部分回答。我们使用传统内容分析法,从这个便利样本中分析关于模型来源及其应用、建模的价值和推荐应用,以及对使用模型的犹豫态度等主题。模型被用于比较不同地区疾病传播趋势、估计社交距离政策的效果以及分配稀缺资源,一些受访者依赖多个模型。决策者希望有更细化的模型,能够预测亚人群中疾病的传播,估计可能发生局部疫情的地点,并纳入广泛的结果,如社会福祉。对使用建模的犹豫包括怀疑模型能否反映人类行为的细微差别、对模型中使用的数据质量的担忧,以及针对当地情况的建模数量有限。决策者认为建模对为组织决策提供信息很有价值,但描述了为此使用模型的能力和意愿各不相同。这些数据为向组织决策者宣传决策支持建模的优点以及向建模团队告知如何构建更能响应组织决策者需求的模型提供了机会。
北卡罗来纳州不同部门(包括公共卫生、教育、商业、政府、宗教和公共安全)的组织在新冠疫情期间使用决策支持建模为决策提供信息。决策者希望模型能预测疾病传播,尤其是在地方层面(如各个城市和县),并帮助估计政策结果。一些组织决策者对使用建模为决策提供信息犹豫不决,原因包括怀疑模型能否反映人类行为的细微差别、对模型中使用的数据的准确性和精确性的担忧,以及地方层面可用的建模数量有限。