Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚不同室内环境地板灰尘中的全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS):水平、变化和人体暴露风险。

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in floor dust from different indoor environments in Australia: Levels, variation, and human exposure risks.

机构信息

QAEHS, Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Health Risk Assessment, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou, 510655, China.

QAEHS, Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2024 Oct;366:143372. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143372. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

Abstract

Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been a global concern in relation to human exposure. Dust has been proven to be an important source of human exposure to many groups of organic pollutants, however, no study so far has systematically evaluated human exposure to PFAS depending on time spent in different indoor environments i.e., houses, offices and public transport vehicles. Archived dust samples were collected from residential houses (n = 38), offices (n = 15), and public transport vehicles (n = 12) in Australia to assess human exposures to PFAS via dust ingestion and dermal contact. Amongst the 19 target analytes, 14 compounds were detected in >50% of the samples. Significantly higher PFAS concentrations were found in dust samples collected from offices with mean ± SD of 400 ± 810 ng/g than houses (170 ± 350 ng/g) and public transport vehicles (39 ± 33 ng/g). Composition patterns of PFAS varied among indoor environments with Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) (median 2.5 ng/g dust) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (median 5.7 ng/g) were the most prevalent compounds detected (DF = 100%). PFOA was the dominant PFAS compound in both offices (median 11 ng/g) and houses (median 5.8 ng/g). Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) (median 3.6 ng/g) was found to be the most abundant compounds in public transport vehicles. Considering the time spent in indoor environments, relatively higher estimated daily intakes (EDIs) were identified in offices than in houses and public transport vehicles. EDIs for PFOA and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) for adults and toddlers were well below the acceptable levels of 20 ng/kg/day proposed by U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Food Standard Australia and New Zealand (USEPA, 2016; FSANZ et al. (2016)), suggesting low or negligible exposure pathways via dust ingestion and dermal contact.

摘要

全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 一直是人类暴露于相关物质的全球性关注点。已证实灰尘是许多有机污染物组进入人体的重要来源,但迄今为止,尚无研究系统评估过不同室内环境(如住宅、办公室和公共交通工具)中人类接触 PFAS 的情况。本研究从澳大利亚的住宅(n = 38)、办公室(n = 15)和公共交通工具(n = 12)中收集了存档的灰尘样本,以评估通过灰尘摄入和皮肤接触途径使人类接触 PFAS 的情况。在所研究的 19 种目标分析物中,有 14 种化合物在超过 50%的样本中被检测到。在办公室收集的灰尘样本中发现的 PFAS 浓度明显高于住宅(平均值 ± 标准偏差,170 ± 350 ng/g)和公共交通工具(39 ± 33 ng/g),平均值 ± 标准偏差为 400 ± 810 ng/g。室内环境中的 PFAS 组成模式有所不同,其中全氟己酸(PFHxA)(中位数 2.5 ng/g 灰尘)和全氟辛酸(PFOA)(中位数 5.7 ng/g)是检测到的最普遍的化合物(DF = 100%)。在办公室(中位数 11 ng/g)和住宅(中位数 5.8 ng/g)中,PFOA 是 PFAS 化合物中的主要成分。在公共交通工具中,发现全氟十二烷酸(PFDoA)(中位数 3.6 ng/g)是最丰富的化合物。考虑到在室内环境中花费的时间,办公室的估计每日摄入量(EDI)相对高于住宅和公共交通工具。美国环境保护署(USEPA)和澳大利亚新西兰食品标准局(USEPA,2016;FSANZ 等人,2016)建议,成人和幼儿的 PFOA 和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)的可接受摄入量为 20 ng/kg/天,因此,通过灰尘摄入和皮肤接触途径导致的 PFOA 和 PFOS 的 EDI 水平较低或可忽略不计,低于这一水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验