• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草监管和经济因素是否会影响戒烟效果?跨国 EAGLES 随机对照试验的事后分析。

Do tobacco regulatory and economic factors influence smoking cessation outcomes? A post-hoc analysis of the multinational EAGLES randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Psychiatry, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, La Jolla, California, USA.

Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e079092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079092.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079092
PMID:39306350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11418566/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We previously reported global regional differences in smoking cessation outcomes, with smokers of US origin having lower quit rates than smokers from some other countries. This post-hoc analysis examined global regional differences in individual-level and country-level epidemiological, economic and tobacco regulatory factors that may affect cessation outcomes.

METHODS

EAGLES (Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study) was a randomised controlled trial that evaluated first-line cessation medications and placebo in 8144 smokers with and without psychiatric disorders from 16 countries across seven regions. Generalised linear and stepwise logistic regression models that considered pharmacotherapy treatment, psychiatric diagnoses, traditional individual-level predictors (eg, demographic and smoking characteristics) and country-specific smoking prevalence rates, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, relative cigarette cost and WHO-derived MPOWER scores were used to predict 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

In addition to several traditional predictors, three of four country-level variables predicted short-term abstinence: GDP (0.54 (95% CI 0.47, 0.63)), cigarette relative income price (0.62 (95% CI 0.53, 0.72)) and MPOWER score (1.03 (95% CI 1.01, 1.06)). Quit rates varied across regions (22.0% in Australasia to 55.9% in Mexico). With northern North America (USA and Canada) as the referent, the likelihood of achieving short-term abstinence was significantly higher in Western Europe (OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.14, 1.61)), but significantly lower in Eastern Europe (0.39 (95% CI 0.22, 0.69)) and South America (0.17 (95% CI 0.08, 0.35)).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased tobacco regulation was associated with enhanced quitting among participants in the EAGLES trial. Paradoxically, lower GDP, and more affordable cigarette pricing relative to a country's GDP, were also associated with higher odds of quitting. Geographical region was also a significant independent predictor.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01456936.

摘要

介绍

我们之前报告了全球戒烟结果的区域差异,与来自某些其他国家的吸烟者相比,美国起源的吸烟者戒烟率较低。本事后分析研究了可能影响戒烟结果的个体和国家层面的流行病学、经济和烟草监管因素的全球区域差异。

方法

EAGLES(评估全球戒烟研究中的不良事件)是一项随机对照试验,评估了来自 7 个地区的 16 个国家的 8144 名患有和不患有精神障碍的吸烟者一线戒烟药物和安慰剂的效果。广义线性和逐步逻辑回归模型考虑了药物治疗、精神诊断、传统个体预测因素(如人口统计学和吸烟特征)以及特定国家的吸烟流行率、国内生产总值(人均 GDP)、相对香烟成本和世卫组织衍生的 MPOWER 评分,用于预测治疗结束时 7 天点戒烟的患病率。

结果

除了几个传统预测因素外,四个国家层面变量中的三个预测了短期戒烟:国内生产总值(0.54(95%置信区间 0.47,0.63))、香烟相对收入价格(0.62(95%置信区间 0.53,0.72))和 MPOWER 评分(1.03(95%置信区间 1.01,1.06))。戒烟率因地区而异(从大洋洲的 22.0%到墨西哥的 55.9%)。以北美北部(美国和加拿大)为参照,西欧(OR1.4(95%置信区间 1.14,1.61))实现短期戒烟的可能性明显更高,但东欧(0.39(95%置信区间 0.22,0.69))和南美洲(0.17(95%置信区间 0.08,0.35))则明显较低。

结论

烟草监管的加强与 EAGLES 试验参与者戒烟率的提高有关。矛盾的是,与一个国家的国内生产总值相比,较低的国内生产总值和香烟价格相对更便宜也与更高的戒烟几率有关。地理位置也是一个重要的独立预测因素。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01456936。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/348f/11418566/f3a2f0741be9/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/348f/11418566/f3a2f0741be9/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/348f/11418566/f3a2f0741be9/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Do tobacco regulatory and economic factors influence smoking cessation outcomes? A post-hoc analysis of the multinational EAGLES randomised controlled trial.烟草监管和经济因素是否会影响戒烟效果?跨国 EAGLES 随机对照试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e079092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079092.
2
Assessment of Racial Differences in Pharmacotherapy Efficacy for Smoking Cessation: Secondary Analysis of the EAGLES Randomized Clinical Trial.评估戒烟药物治疗疗效的种族差异:EAGLES 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32053.
3
Predictors of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events with Smoking Cessation Medications in the Randomized Controlled EAGLES Trial.戒烟药物治疗与随机对照 EAGLES 试验中神经精神不良事件的预测因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04858-2. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Factors associated with the efficacy of smoking cessation treatments and predictors of smoking abstinence in EAGLES.与戒烟治疗疗效相关的因素及 EAGLES 中戒烟成功的预测因子。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1507-1516. doi: 10.1111/add.14208. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
[Application of the cigarette purchase tasks in achieving China' s tobacco control goals].[香烟购买任务在实现中国烟草控制目标中的应用]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Jun 18;56(3):479-486. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.015.
6
Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.在有和没有精神疾病的吸烟者中,评估伐伦克林、安非他酮和尼古丁贴片的神经精神安全性和疗效(EAGLES):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2016 Jun 18;387(10037):2507-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
8
E-cigarettes compared with nicotine replacement therapy within the UK Stop Smoking Services: the TEC RCT.电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法在英国戒烟服务中的比较:TEC RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(43):1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta23430.
9
Medication-assisted quit rates in participants with smoking-related diseases in EAGLES: Post hoc analyses of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.EAGLES研究中患有吸烟相关疾病参与者的药物辅助戒烟率:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验的事后分析
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 May 10;20:46. doi: 10.18332/tid/146567. eCollection 2022.
10
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence.加热烟草制品戒烟和降低吸烟率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Contribution of smoking to the global burden of bladder cancer from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2046.1990年至2021年吸烟对全球膀胱癌负担的贡献及到2046年的预测。
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Mar 28;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/202237. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in risks from smoking between high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of data from 179 000 participants from 63 countries.高收入、中低收入国家人群吸烟风险差异:63 个国家 17.9 万名参与者数据分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e216-e226. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00509-X.
2
Age as a predictor of quit attempts and quit success in smoking cessation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country survey (2002-14).年龄对戒烟尝试和戒烟成功的预测作用:来自国际烟草控制四项国家调查(2002-2014 年)的结果。
Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2509-2520. doi: 10.1111/add.15454. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Factors associated with abstinence after a recent smoking cessation attempt across 28 European Union member states.
28个欧盟成员国近期戒烟尝试后与戒烟相关的因素。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Jan 25;7:5. doi: 10.18332/tpc/132123. eCollection 2021.
4
Correction to: Gaps and challenges: WHO treatment recommendations for tobacco cessation and management of substance use disorders in people with severe mental illness.对《差距与挑战:世界卫生组织关于严重精神疾病患者戒烟及物质使用障碍管理的治疗建议》的勘误
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02684-z.
5
An Update on Hardening: A Qualitative Review.硬化研究进展:定性评价
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):867-871. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz042.
6
Impact assessment of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: introduction, general findings and discussion.《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》的影响评估:引言、总体结果与讨论
Tob Control. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):s81-s83. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054429. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Factors associated with the efficacy of smoking cessation treatments and predictors of smoking abstinence in EAGLES.与戒烟治疗疗效相关的因素及 EAGLES 中戒烟成功的预测因子。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1507-1516. doi: 10.1111/add.14208. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Effects of Varenicline, Depressive Symptoms, and Region of Enrollment on Smoking Cessation in Depressed Smokers.伐伦克林、抑郁症状和入组地区对抑郁吸烟人群戒烟的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):156-162. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty033.
9
Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study.实施世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的主要减少需求措施与 126 个国家吸烟率的变化:一项关联研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Apr;2(4):e166-e174. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30045-2. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990-2015 年 195 个国家和地区的吸烟流行率和可归因疾病负担:来自 2015 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1885-1906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30819-X. Epub 2017 Apr 5.