• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理东南亚国家公共卫生紧急事件(PHEICs)的组织模型:系统评价议定书。

Organisational models for managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs) in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR) nations: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Country Office, New Delhi, India

Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP), National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Delhi, India.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e084673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084673.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084673
PMID:39306358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11418483/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The current literature suggests that the frequency and complexity of public health emergencies are rising and this trend will likely continue. From 2000 to 2023, seven events have been declared as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization (WHO). Organisational models such as the Incident Management System, Incident Response System and Incident Command System or country-specific models are essential in managing PHEIC.The review aims to achieve four key objectives. First, identify and describe the organisational models used in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR) nations defined by WHO as Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Timor-Leste and DPR Korea for managing PHEICs. Second, explore the indicators used to gauge the effectiveness of these models. Third, assess how these indicators impact the overall success of organisational models. Finally, the review will delve into the implementation aspects gaining a deeper understanding of how the organisational models are put into practice to manage PHEICs in the SEAR region.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines, a qualitative evidence synthesis will be conducted. A defined search strategy will be employed to conduct a comprehensive literature search of the following academic databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, WHO Library Database, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report and Web of Science; as well as non-academic databases including Google Scholar, Evidence Aid, Epistemonikos, Shodhganga and ResearchGate. This review will employ the SPIDER-D tool for searching qualitative studies. Two reviewers will check the quality of included studies and will be appraised using standard critical appraisal tools. In case of any difference between the two reviewers, a third reviewer will take the decision.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is required. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through a workshop for stakeholders and policymakers.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023394418.

摘要

简介

目前的文献表明,公共卫生紧急事件的频率和复杂性正在上升,而且这种趋势很可能会持续下去。从 2000 年到 2023 年,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)已经宣布了七起国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)。事件管理系统、事件应对系统和事件指挥系统等组织模式,或者国家特定模式,对于管理 PHEIC 至关重要。本综述旨在实现四个主要目标。首先,确定并描述世卫组织定义的东南亚区域(SEAR)国家,即孟加拉国、不丹、印度、印度尼西亚、马尔代夫、缅甸、尼泊尔、斯里兰卡、泰国、东帝汶和朝鲜民主主义人民共和国,用于管理 PHEIC 的组织模式。其次,探索用于评估这些模式有效性的指标。第三,评估这些指标如何影响组织模式的整体成功。最后,本综述将深入探讨实施方面,更深入地了解组织模式如何在 SEAR 地区实施以管理 PHEIC。

方法与分析

根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告议定书的首选报告项目,将进行定性证据综合。将采用明确的搜索策略,对以下学术数据库进行全面的文献搜索:PubMed(医学文献在线数据库)、Excerpta Medica Database、Cochrane CENTRAL、护理与联合健康文献累积索引、世卫组织图书馆数据库、美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)、CDC 的发病率和死亡率周报和 Web of Science;以及非学术数据库,包括谷歌学术、证据援助、Epistemonikos、Shodhganga 和 ResearchGate。本综述将使用 SPIDER-D 工具搜索定性研究。两名评审员将检查纳入研究的质量,并使用标准的批判性评估工具进行评估。如果两名评审员之间存在差异,将由第三名评审员做出决定。

伦理与传播

不需要伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并通过研讨会传播给利益攸关方和政策制定者。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023394418。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4107/11418483/8d53ea23dbc2/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4107/11418483/8d53ea23dbc2/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4107/11418483/8d53ea23dbc2/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Organisational models for managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs) in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR) nations: protocol for a systematic review.管理东南亚国家公共卫生紧急事件(PHEICs)的组织模型:系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e084673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084673.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
An appraisal of peer-reviewed published literature on Influenza, 2000-2021 from countries in South-East Asia Region.评估 2000-2021 年东南亚国家发表的关于流感的同行评议文献。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1127891. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1127891. eCollection 2023.
5
Success and challenges of health systems resilience-enhancing strategies for managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): A systematic review protocol.提升卫生系统弹性的策略在应对国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)方面的成功与挑战:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):e067829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067829.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Development of Diabetic retinopathy screening guidelines in South-East Asia region using the context, challenges, and future technology.制定东南亚地区糖尿病视网膜病变筛查指南:背景、挑战和未来技术
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):97-104. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1925308. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Global impact of tobacco control policies on smokeless tobacco use: a systematic review protocol.烟草控制政策对无烟烟草使用的全球影响:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 24;10(12):e042860. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042860.
10
Disclosure, transparency, and accountability: a qualitative survey of public sector pharmaceutical committee conflict of interest policies in the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region.披露、透明和问责制:世界卫生组织东南亚区域公立部门药物委员会利益冲突政策的定性调查。
Global Health. 2022 Mar 18;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00822-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Emergency Risk Management in World Health Organization - South-East Asia Region during 2014-2023: synthesis of experiences.2014 - 2023年世界卫生组织东南亚区域的卫生应急风险管理:经验总结
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Oct 29;18:100304. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100304. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Development of the Scientific, Transparent and Applicable Rankings (STAR) tool for clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南的科学、透明和适用排名(STAR)工具的制定。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Jun 20;136(12):1430-1438. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002713. Epub 2023 May 16.
3
Evidence and gap map of studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for people with disabilities in low-and middle-income countries.
评估中低收入国家残疾人干预措施有效性的研究证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;16(1):e1070. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1070. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials.运用案例研究设计过程评估,以探索试验中评估的复杂干预措施的背景。
Trials. 2020 Nov 27;21(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4.
5
Public health emergency preparedness: a framework to promote resilience.突发公共卫生事件应急准备:促进恢复力的框架。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6250-7.
6
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
7
The Evolution of Public Health Emergency Management as a Field of Practice.公共卫生应急管理作为一个实践领域的演变
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S126-S133. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303947.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.超越 PICO:用于定性证据综合的 SPIDER 工具。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.系统评价中定性研究的主题综合方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.