• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

漏斗胸真空吸盘治疗15年:长期疗效及影响因素

15 Years of Vacuum Bell Therapy for Pectus Excavatum: Long-term Outcomes and Influencing Factors.

作者信息

van Braak Hendrik, de Beer Sjoerd A, Al Ghouch Youssef, Zwaveling Sander, Oomen Matthijs W N, van Heurn L W Ernest, de Jong Justin R

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Kinderziekenhuis, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Kinderziekenhuis, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Feb;60(2):161891. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161891. Epub 2024 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161891
PMID:39306540
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term results and factors affecting outcomes of vacuum bell therapy for pectus excavatum are relatively unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on patients (<18y) treated with vacuum bell therapy between May 2008 and October 2021. Primary outcome was treatment success; secondary outcomes were analysis of daily time spent on treatment, treatment duration, complications, long-term follow-up, treatment for patients awaiting a Nuss procedure, treatment for female patients, and factors affecting outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 259 patients treated with vacuum bell therapy, 18.9% (n = 49/259) were still being treated, 17.4% (n = 45/259) were lost to follow-up and 63.7% (n = 165/259) completed treatment, with a 52.1% (n = 86/165) success rate. Median follow-up was 64.0 months (interquartile range 48.0-87.0). More time spent daily on vacuum bell therapy, total treatment duration, and overnight use led to a higher success rate (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001 resp.). Complications (22.8%, n = 59/259) were minor, recurrence occurred in 2.3% (n = 2/86) of patients. Of the patients treated while awaiting a Nuss procedure, 26.7% (n = 4/15) no longer required the Nuss procedure. Breast growth made 39.3% (n = 11/28) of female patients quit treatment. Deeper deformities (P = 0.02, P = 0.009), flexible chest wall (P = 0.007) and symptomatic pectus excavatum (P = 0.02) resulted in lower success rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Vacuum bell therapy is successful in up to 52.1% of patients. Overnight vacuum bell use and treatment while awaiting a Nuss procedure should be encouraged. Older patients with a stiff chest wall can be successfully treated with prolonged treatment. For female patients watchful waiting or early treatment, to prevent challenges during breast growth, is preferred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

摘要

背景

漏斗胸真空吸盘治疗的长期效果及影响预后的因素尚不清楚。

方法

我们对2008年5月至2021年10月期间接受真空吸盘治疗的患者(<18岁)进行了一项回顾性研究。主要结局是治疗成功;次要结局包括分析每日治疗时间、治疗持续时间、并发症、长期随访、等待Nuss手术患者的治疗、女性患者的治疗以及影响预后的因素。

结果

在259例接受真空吸盘治疗的患者中,18.9%(n = 49/259)仍在接受治疗,17.4%(n = 45/259)失访,63.7%(n = 165/259)完成治疗,成功率为52.1%(n = 86/165)。中位随访时间为64.0个月(四分位间距48.0 - 87.0)。每日在真空吸盘治疗上花费更多时间、总治疗持续时间以及夜间使用导致更高的成功率(分别为P = 0.002、P < 0.001、P < 0.001)。并发症发生率为22.8%(n = 59/259),程度较轻,2.3%(n = 2/86)的患者出现复发。在等待Nuss手术期间接受治疗的患者中,26.7%(n = 4/15)不再需要Nuss手术。乳房发育导致39.3%(n = 11/28)的女性患者停止治疗。畸形程度更深(P = 0.02,P = 0.009)、胸壁柔韧性好(P = 0.007)以及有症状的漏斗胸(P = 0.02)导致成功率较低。

结论

真空吸盘治疗在高达52.1%的患者中取得成功。应鼓励夜间使用真空吸盘以及在等待Nuss手术期间进行治疗。胸壁僵硬的年长患者通过延长治疗可成功治愈。对于女性患者,建议密切观察或早期治疗,以避免乳房发育期间出现问题。

证据级别

二级。

相似文献

1
15 Years of Vacuum Bell Therapy for Pectus Excavatum: Long-term Outcomes and Influencing Factors.漏斗胸真空吸盘治疗15年:长期疗效及影响因素
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Feb;60(2):161891. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161891. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
2
Nonoperative management of pectus excavatum with vacuum bell therapy: A single center study.真空吸盘疗法非手术治疗漏斗胸:一项单中心研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jun;53(6):1221-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.088. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
Vacuum bell therapy for pectus excavatum: a retrospective study.真空钟疗法治疗漏斗胸:回顾性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Mar 9;24(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04615-3.
4
Vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum: An early North American experience.漏斗胸的负压钟治疗:北美早期经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jan;54(1):194-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Monitoring the effectiveness of the vacuum bell during pectus excavatum treatment: Technical innovation.漏斗胸治疗期间真空吸盘效果的监测:技术创新
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
The vacuum bell for treatment of pectus excavatum: an alternative to surgical correction?用于治疗漏斗胸的负压钟罩:手术矫正的替代方法?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):557-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.025. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
7
Vacuum Bell Therapy for Pectus Excavatum: Long-term Experience at a Single Center.
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Mar;60(3):162020. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162020. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
8
Failed preoperative vacuum bell therapy does not affect outcomes following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.术前真空钟疗法失败不影响微创漏斗胸修复术后的结果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Oct;37(10):1429-1435. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04963-6. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
9
The vacuum bell for conservative treatment of pectus excavatum: the Basle experience.用于漏斗胸保守治疗的真空吸盘:巴塞尔经验
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Jun;27(6):623-7. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2843-7.
10
Determinants of success associated with vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum.与真空钟治疗漏斗胸相关的成功因素。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Nov;57(11):550-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
An overview of pectus deformities and rehabilitation approaches.鸡胸畸形与康复方法概述。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 May 23;71(2):131-138. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2025.16840. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Evaluating Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement on Pectus Carinatum Severity and Treatment Outcomes: A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods.评估鸡胸严重程度及治疗结果的观察者间和观察者内一致性:主观与客观评估方法的比较
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jun;35(3):232-239. doi: 10.1055/a-2466-6407. Epub 2024 Nov 13.