Santos José Wittor de Macêdo, Mueller Andreas Albert, Benitez Benito K, Lill Yoriko, Nalabothu Prasad, Muniz Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel and University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Feb;28(1):166-174. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12859. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
To evaluate the performance of smartphone scanning applications (apps) in acquiring 3D meshes of cleft palate models. Secondarily, to validate a machine learning (ML) tool for computing automated presurgical plate (PSP).
We conducted a comparative analysis of two apps on 15 cleft palate models: five unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), five bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and five isolated cleft palate (ICP). The scans were performed with and without a mirror to simulate intraoral acquisition. The 3D reconstructions were compared to control reconstructions acquired using a professional intraoral scanner using open-source software.
Thirty 3D scans were acquired by each app, totalling 60 scans. The main findings were in the UCLP sample, where the KIRI scans without a mirror (0.22 ± 0.03 mm) had a good performance with a deviation from the ground truth comparable to the control group (0.14 ± 0.13 mm) (p = .653). Scaniverse scans with a mirror showed the lowest accuracy of all the samples. The ML tool was able to predict the landmarks and automatically generate the plates, except in ICP models. KIRI scans' plates showed better performance with (0.22 ± 0.06 mm) and without mirror (0.18 ± 0.05 mm), being comparable with controls (0.16 ± 0.08 mm) (p = .954 and p = .439, respectively).
KIRI Engine performed better in scanning UCLP models without a mirror. The ML tool showed a high capability for morphology recognition and automated PSP generation.
评估智能手机扫描应用程序(应用)获取腭裂模型三维网格的性能。其次,验证一种用于计算自动化术前钢板(PSP)的机器学习(ML)工具。
我们对15个腭裂模型上的两款应用进行了对比分析:5个单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)、5个双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)和5个单纯腭裂(ICP)。扫描时使用和不使用镜子以模拟口内采集。使用开源软件将三维重建结果与使用专业口内扫描仪获取的对照重建结果进行比较。
每个应用获取了30次三维扫描,共60次扫描。主要发现存在于UCLP样本中,其中不使用镜子的KIRI扫描(0.22±0.03毫米)表现良好,与对照组(0.14±0.13毫米)相比偏离真实值程度相当(p = 0.653)。使用镜子的Scaniverse扫描在所有样本中显示出最低的准确性。除了ICP模型外,ML工具能够预测地标并自动生成钢板。KIRI扫描的钢板在使用镜子(0.22±0.06毫米)和不使用镜子(0.18±0.05毫米)时表现更好,与对照组(0.16±0.08毫米)相当(分别为p = 0.954和p = 0.439)。
KIRI Engine在不使用镜子扫描UCLP模型时表现更好。ML工具在形态识别和自动化PSP生成方面显示出很高的能力。