Suppr超能文献

结构化呼吸物理治疗方案在儿科重症监护中用于消除肺不张。

Structured respiratory physiotherapy protocol for resolution of atelectasis in pediatric intensive care.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Postgraduate Program in Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Sep 21;79:100494. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100494. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Children are at higher risk of atelectasis due to their anatomical and physiological particularities. Several physiotherapy techniques are used to treat atelectasis, but only four studies cite methods in pediatric patients undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV). The objective of this study was to evaluate the Structured Respiratory Physiotherapy Protocol (SRPP) for airway clearance and lung reexpansion for infants on IMV with atelectasis. This is a prospective study including 30 infants (mean ± standard deviation age 8.9 ± 8.0 months; weight 7.5 ± 3.0 kg; BMI 15.8 ± 1.6 kg/cm and IMV duration 7.7 ± 4.3 days). The sample was randomized into a Control Group (CG), which received routine physiotherapy, and an Intervention Group (IG), submitted to SRPP (postural drainage, mechanical thoracic vibration, manual hyperinflation, stretching of the accessory respiratory muscles, and functional positioning). Both groups were evaluated before and after physiotherapy for respiratory effort using the Wood Downes Score (WD) and pulmonary aeration using lung ultrasonography (Lung Ultrasound Score ‒ LUS). The outcome of the intervention was evaluated by the magnitude of the effect by the Hedges' g test [(small (0.2 < Hedges' g < 0.5), moderate (0.5 < Hedges' g < 0.8) and large (Hedges' g > 0.8) effects]. There were large within-group effects on the reduction of WD in the CG after intervention in both the CG (Hedges' g = -1.53) and IG (Hedges' g = -2.2). There was a moderate effect on LUS reduction in the CG (Hedges' g = -0.64) and a large effect on IG (Hedges' g = -1.88). This study has shown that the SRPP appears to be safe and may be effective in improving airway clearance and lung reexpansion in children on IMV with atelectasis.

摘要

儿童由于其解剖学和生理学的特殊性,患肺不张的风险更高。有几种物理疗法可用于治疗肺不张,但只有四项研究提到了在接受有创机械通气(IMV)的儿科患者中使用的方法。本研究旨在评估结构性呼吸物理治疗方案(SRPP)在有肺不张的 IMV 婴儿中气道清除和肺复张的效果。这是一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 30 名婴儿(平均年龄 ± 标准差 8.9 ± 8.0 个月;体重 7.5 ± 3.0 公斤;BMI 15.8 ± 1.6 公斤/厘米和 IMV 持续时间 7.7 ± 4.3 天)。样本随机分为对照组(CG),接受常规物理治疗,和干预组(IG),接受 SRPP(体位引流、机械胸部振动、手动过度充气、辅助呼吸肌伸展和功能定位)。两组在接受物理治疗前后均采用 Wood Downes 评分(WD)评估呼吸努力程度,并用肺部超声(Lung Ultrasound Score - LUS)评估肺充气情况。采用 Hedges' g 检验评估干预效果的大小(小(0.2 < Hedges' g < 0.5)、中(0.5 < Hedges' g < 0.8)和大(Hedges' g > 0.8))。CG 在干预后 WD 降低的组内效果较大(CG 为 -1.53,IG 为 -2.2)。CG 在 LUS 降低方面的效果为中度(Hedges' g = -0.64),IG 的效果为大(Hedges' g = -1.88)。本研究表明,SRPP 似乎是安全的,可能有助于改善有肺不张的 IMV 婴儿的气道清除和肺复张。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b440/11440321/c7bcb03f469b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验