School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia; NSW Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: A Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Centre, Rydalmere, NSW, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, QLD, Australia.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Oct;80:104130. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104130. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
To map the characteristics of nursing educators' competency standards for practice from the existing literature, examine the evidence and identify commonalities and differences.
Many countries or regions have produced nursing educator standards, however, there is no common set of standards or competencies used globally. Mapping these nursing educator standards should identify a common set of standards that can be applied across any nursing educator practice setting.
The review was conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and followed an a priori protocol.
A comprehensive search of studies or guidelines (2001-2022) was undertaken to identify specific nursing educator competencies from any practice setting and in any language. Preceptorship and mentorship studies were excluded from the search terms. Databases searched for relevant records and guidelines were CINAHL, ERIC, Medline (Ovid), Pubmed, Scopus, Google and targeted websites. After screening and selection, relevant data were extracted and summarized using an extraction guide. Characteristics of the reports were identified and all three levels of competency statements were mapped against commonly occurring categories derived from the data.
1145 evidence records were screened after removal of duplicates with 14 records included in the review. The included evidence sources were from various nursing educator practice settings and educator roles. All evidence sources had at least two levels of competency statements and 16 competency categories were identified. Common categories in the first two competency levels were: leadership and management; research and scholarship; professional values and professional development; and facilitating learning. Statements related to learner evaluation were also common in the level 2 competencies. Level 3 competencies were included in seven evidence sources and most of the sources included almost all categories. Low-occurring statements at all levels were in the 'Nursing skills' and 'Decision-making/strategic planning" categories.
Common characteristics and categories were found between different evidence sources in this review. The most common competency review categories included leadership and management, professional development and facilitating learning. Few decision-making competencies were identified from the evidence sources. These results can inform educators and managers in developing globally-based nursing educator competencies, performance management tools and job descriptions.
从现有文献中绘制护理教育者实践能力标准的特征,检查证据并确定异同。
许多国家或地区都制定了护理教育者标准,但全球没有通用的一套标准或能力。绘制这些护理教育者标准应确定一套可应用于任何护理教育者实践环境的通用标准。
本综述使用 JBI 方法进行范围综述,并遵循预先制定的方案。
全面搜索 2001 年至 2022 年的研究或指南,以确定任何实践环境和任何语言中的特定护理教育者能力。指导和指导研究不包括在搜索词中。搜索数据库包括 CINAHL、ERIC、Medline(Ovid)、PubMed、Scopus、Google 和目标网站的相关记录和指南。筛选和选择后,使用提取指南提取和总结相关数据。确定报告的特征,并将所有三级能力陈述与数据中得出的常见类别进行映射。
在去除重复项后,筛选出 1145 份证据记录,其中包括 14 篇文献纳入综述。纳入的证据来源来自各种护理教育者实践环境和教育者角色。所有证据来源都至少有两级能力陈述,确定了 16 个能力类别。前两个能力水平的常见类别包括:领导力和管理;研究和奖学金;专业价值观和专业发展;以及促进学习。在二级能力中,与学习者评估相关的陈述也很常见。三级能力陈述包括在七个证据来源中,大多数来源都包括几乎所有类别。在所有级别中,出现频率较低的陈述是在“护理技能”和“决策/战略规划”类别中。
在本次综述中,不同证据来源之间发现了共同的特征和类别。最常见的能力审查类别包括领导力和管理、专业发展和促进学习。从证据来源中确定的决策能力很少。这些结果可以为教育者和管理者在制定基于全球的护理教育者能力、绩效管理工具和工作描述方面提供信息。