Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Apr;19(4):794-841. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00100.
The objective of this scoping review was to examine and map the literature on defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies for nurses and nursing students.
Over the past three decades, nursing informatics competency research has evolved markedly within countries and nursing roles. It is important to examine the available literature on defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies to inform education, clinical practice, policy, and future research.
We considered literature that defined or assessed the concept of nursing informatics competency as a combination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. This included nursing informatics competencies of nurses and nursing students in a variety of health care or academic settings.
An extensive search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text via EBSCO, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO, ProQuest ERIC, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, ProQuest Australian Education Index, ProQuest Education Databases, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, OCLC PapersFirst, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. The initial search was conducted in May 2017 and updated several times. Nursing informatics websites were searched for gray literature, including unpublished research and organizational documents. Additional papers were identified based on a search of reference lists of all the included papers. Neither language nor date restrictions were applied. Two reviewers assessed each of the included papers independently. Data extraction was undertaken using an extraction tool developed specifically for the scoping review objectives.
Fifty-two papers were included. Thirty-four papers identified nursing informatics competencies, grouped into four categories: i) nursing informatics competencies for students, entry-level nurses, or generalist nurses; ii) nursing informatics competencies for a specific nursing role; iii) recommendations for consensus on defining core nursing informatics competencies at the international level; and iv) forecasting future nursing informatics competencies as per evolving nursing roles. Eighteen papers reported on nursing informatics competency assessment tools. Results were discussed in a narrative format supported by tables.
This review provided insights to the state of the science on defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies for nurses and nursing students. Several nursing informatics competency lists are available, and despite some variations in domains of nursing informatics competency and indicator statements, they mostly share common themes. This literature demonstrates a heightened awareness of the importance of nursing informatics competency; however, the availability of many lists may be challenging for frontline nursing staff, nursing educators, administrators, researchers, and students to assimilate. Further research is needed to reach a consensus on core domains of nursing informatics competency and associated indicators, preferably per nursing roles, with international involvement and consensus. Additionally, while many nursing informatics competency assessment tools exist, further research is needed to examine psychometric properties of some of these tools.
本次范围综述的目的是研究和绘制有关护士和护生护理信息学能力的定义和评估的文献。
在过去的三十年中,护理信息学能力研究在国家和护理角色中已经有了明显的发展。检查有关护理信息学能力的定义和评估的现有文献以提供教育、临床实践、政策和未来研究的信息非常重要。
我们考虑了将护理信息学能力定义或评估为知识、技能和态度相结合的文献。这包括各种医疗保健或学术环境中护士和护生的护理信息学能力。
在 Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus with Full Text via EBSCO、Ovid Embase、Ovid PsycINFO、ProQuest ERIC、Health and Psychosocial Instruments、ProQuest Australian Education Index、ProQuest Education Databases、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global、OCLC PapersFirst、Scopus、Web of Science Core Collection、Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 和 JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 中进行了广泛的搜索。最初的搜索于 2017 年 5 月进行,并进行了多次更新。搜索护理信息学网站以获取灰色文献,包括未发表的研究和组织文件。根据纳入论文的参考文献列表,还确定了其他论文。未对语言或日期进行限制。两名评审员独立评估了纳入的每一篇论文。使用专门为范围综述目的开发的提取工具进行数据提取。
共纳入 52 篇论文。34 篇论文确定了护理信息学能力,分为四类:i)学生、入门级护士或普通护士的护理信息学能力;ii)特定护理角色的护理信息学能力;iii)关于在国际层面就定义核心护理信息学能力达成共识的建议;和 iv)根据不断发展的护理角色预测未来的护理信息学能力。18 篇论文报告了护理信息学能力评估工具。结果以表格支持的叙述格式进行讨论。
本综述提供了有关定义和评估护士和护生护理信息学能力的科学现状的见解。有几个护理信息学能力清单,尽管护理信息学能力领域和指标陈述存在一些差异,但它们大多具有共同的主题。这些文献表明,人们越来越意识到护理信息学能力的重要性;然而,许多清单的可用性可能会使一线护理人员、护理教育者、管理人员、研究人员和学生难以吸收。需要进一步研究以就护理信息学能力的核心领域及其相关指标达成共识,最好是根据护理角色进行,同时需要国际参与和共识。此外,虽然有许多护理信息学能力评估工具,但仍需要进一步研究一些工具的心理测量学特性。