• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育者能力的发展与专业评审过程。

Development of educator competencies and the professional review process.

作者信息

Johnson Sue

机构信息

Clinical Staff Development, Parkview Health System, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805, USA.

出版信息

J Nurses Staff Dev. 2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):92-102. doi: 10.1097/00124645-200203000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00124645-200203000-00008
PMID:11984263
Abstract

As staff development educators prepare themselves and their organizations for forthcoming healthcare challenges, educators influence the practice of staff development through the use of competencies. Because competencies and peer review are expectations for staff, educator competencies and educator professional review should be essential for those who train staff. Based upon the American Nurses Association Standards of Practice, National Nursing Staff Development Organization research, and Patricia Benner's work, competencies for educators reflect practice levels from novice to expert and challenge educators to attain levels of excellence in practice. Use of educator competencies includes the professional review process components of peer input, self-evaluation, and portfolio development. Portfolio development provides documentation of educator accomplishments for the organization. This approach to educator competencies serves as a strategy to position educators to meet healthcare demands and demonstrates leadership in the profession. The staff development educators at a large Midwestern health system have refined this process during the past 2 years, and their unique approach to educator competencies and professional review can benefit both individual educators and healthcare organizations now and in the future.

摘要

随着员工发展教育工作者为即将到来的医疗保健挑战做好自身及组织的准备,教育工作者通过运用能力来影响员工发展的实践。由于能力和同行评审是对员工的期望,教育工作者的能力和教育工作者专业评审对于培训员工的人来说应该至关重要。基于美国护士协会的实践标准、国家护理员工发展组织的研究以及帕特里夏·本纳的著作,教育工作者的能力反映了从新手到专家的实践水平,并促使教育工作者在实践中达到卓越水平。教育工作者能力的运用包括同行输入、自我评估和档案袋发展等专业评审过程组成部分。档案袋发展为组织提供了教育工作者成就的文件记录。这种教育工作者能力方法作为一种策略,使教育工作者能够满足医疗保健需求,并在该行业中展现领导力。中西部一家大型医疗系统的员工发展教育工作者在过去两年中完善了这一过程,他们独特的教育工作者能力和专业评审方法现在及未来都能使个体教育工作者和医疗保健组织受益。

相似文献

1
Development of educator competencies and the professional review process.教育者能力的发展与专业评审过程。
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):92-102. doi: 10.1097/00124645-200203000-00008.
2
Developing a Theory-Based Simulation Educator Resource.开发基于理论的模拟教育者资源。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):340-2. doi: 10.5480/15-1673.
3
Developing healthcare educators. The application of a conceptual model.培养医疗保健教育工作者。一种概念模型的应用。
J Nurs Staff Dev. 1996 Sep-Oct;12(5):252-9.
4
Measurement issues in promoting continued competence.促进持续能力发展中的测量问题。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2001 May-Jun;32(3):102-6; quiz 138-9. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-20010501-04.
5
Perinatal Clinical Nurse Educator: Clinical Competencies and Education Guide.围产期临床护士教育者:临床能力与教育指南
Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Jun;25(3):S1-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Competency assessment of nursing staff.护理人员能力评估
Orthop Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;25(3):198-202; quiz 203-4. doi: 10.1097/00006416-200605000-00008.
7
A standard for professional development: the use of self and peer review; learning contracts and reflection in clinical practice.专业发展标准:自我与同行评审的运用;学习契约与临床实践反思。
J Nurs Manag. 1994 May;2(3):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1994.tb00144.x.
8
Open education resources to support the WHO nurse educator core competencies.开放教育资源以支持世卫组织护士教育者核心能力。
Int Nurs Rev. 2020 Jun;67(2):282-287. doi: 10.1111/inr.12583. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
The Capabilities of Nurse Educators (CONE) questionnaire: Development and evaluation.护士教育者能力(CONE)问卷:编制与评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Fit for practice. Part 2.5: Reflection and learning.适用于实践。第2.5部分:反思与学习。
Nurs Times. 2001;97(9):45-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of training in oral health educational programs: What do primary healthcare providers think?口腔健康教育项目中的培训质量:初级医疗保健提供者怎么看?
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Mar 31;9:60. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_471_19. eCollection 2020.