Suppr超能文献

国际专家如何定义预先护理计划:一项内容分析

How international experts would define advance care planning: a content analysis.

作者信息

van der Steen Jenny T, de Wit Emma J, Visser Mandy, Nakanishi Miharu, Van den Block Lieve, Korfage Ida J, In der Schmitten Jürgen, Sudore Rebecca L

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Radboudumc Alzheimer Center and Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Nov;13(6):1409-1419. doi: 10.21037/apm-24-57. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Abstract

Planning for future medical treatment, and care, referred to as advance care planning (ACP), has evolved to a focus on conversations that explore values and preferences in a broad sense. Given diverse practices internationally, we examined how international experts would define ACP themselves and whether this differs by medical profession. In an explorative study embedded in a Delphi study on ACP in dementia, experts in ACP in persons with dementia and other diseases reported at baseline how they would define ACP "in one sentence, off the top of your head". We analyzed the text of the reported definitions with content analysis, created codes to identify small definition elements, then merged them into categories. We assessed phrasing from a patient, healthcare professional, or neutral perspective. Almost half (45%) of 87 experts from 30 countries phrased ACP from a patient perspective (29% neutral, 26% professional). Codes (n=131) were merged into 19 categories. Five categories appeared in more than half of the definitions: 'Choosing between options', 'Care and treatment', 'Planning for the future', 'Individual person' and 'Having conversations'. Other categories, including 'End of life' and 'Documentation' were mentioned by a minority of experts. The categories and perspectives did not appreciably differ between physicians and other professionals. In conclusion, international experts from 30 countries typically defined ACP as person-centered conversations to choose future care and treatment, without focusing on end of life or documentation. Future research should evaluate the extent to which such conceptualization of ACP is present within clinical programs and practice recommendations and our work may serve as a starting point to monitor changes over time. Registration: World Health Organization Clinical Trial Registry Platform (NL9720).

摘要

对未来医疗和护理的规划,即所谓的预先护理规划(ACP),已逐渐演变为侧重于探讨广义上的价值观和偏好的对话。鉴于国际上存在多种做法,我们研究了国际专家如何自行定义ACP,以及这是否因医学专业而异。在一项嵌入关于痴呆症ACP的德尔菲研究中的探索性研究中,痴呆症患者和其他疾病患者的ACP专家在基线时报告了他们将如何“不假思索地用一句话”定义ACP。我们采用内容分析法分析了所报告定义的文本,创建代码以识别小的定义元素,然后将它们合并为类别。我们从患者、医疗保健专业人员或中立的角度评估措辞。来自30个国家的87位专家中,近一半(45%)从患者角度表述ACP(29%为中立,26%为专业)。代码(n = 131)被合并为19个类别。五个类别出现在超过一半的定义中:“在选项之间进行选择”、“护理和治疗”、“为未来做规划”、“个人”和“进行对话”。其他类别,包括“生命末期”和“文件记录”,只有少数专家提及。医生和其他专业人员之间的类别和角度没有明显差异。总之,来自30个国家的国际专家通常将ACP定义为以个人为中心的对话,以选择未来的护理和治疗,而不侧重于生命末期或文件记录。未来的研究应评估这种ACP概念在临床项目和实践建议中的存在程度,我们的工作可作为监测随时间变化的起点。注册:世界卫生组织临床试验注册平台(NL9720)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验