Gill Jatinder S, Stippler Martina, Ruan Qing, Hussain Nasir, White Andrew P, Oruhurhu Vwaire, Malik Obaid, Simopoulos Thomas, Urits Ivan, D'Souza Ryan S, Narang Sanjeet, Hirsch Joshua A
Department of Anesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Interv Pain Med. 2024 Sep 10;3(3):100438. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100438. eCollection 2024 Sep.
To retrospectively assess the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) and compare the treatment given with that predicted by the TLICS score.
All medical records of patients presenting from January 2014 to November 2017 for acute atraumatic or low impact OVCF were screened, and eligible patients were retrospectively reviewed. The TLICS score was determined based upon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical records. Clinical records (including pain score data), imaging data, operative procedures, and stability of neurological examination were tracked over three months for each patient.
Of the 56 patients included, 36 patients had a TLICS score of 1, 18 had a TLICS score of 2, and two had a TLICS score of 4. Only one patient with a TLICS score of 4 underwent surgical stabilization, while the rest of the cohort was managed non-operatively, with or without kyphoplasty. TLICS score 1 corresponded to simple compression and TLICS score 2 corresponded to burst morphology with retropulsion and without neurological deficits. Of the patients with a TLICS score of 1 and 2 who underwent kyphoplasty, there was a statistically significant improvement in pain scores in both groups; however no significant difference was observed, between each TLICS score (i.e., 1 or 2). None of the patients developed instability or neurological decline.
TLICS score correctly predicted operative versus non-operative management in all patients with OVCF. TLICS may be used in making management decisions, and in the triage of these patients for operative versus non-operative evaluations. Our study suggests that patients with TLICS score of 4 or higher require surgical evaluation, while those with TLICS of 1 or 2 are likely to have satisfactory non-surgical management with augmentation or conservative care. In general, patients with OVCF typically present with low TLICS score. Kyphoplasty appears to be similarly beneficial in patients with a TLICS score of 1 or a TLICS score of 2. A modification of the TLICS score by adding TLICS Zero to include uncompressed OVCF with edema is suggested. The limitations of this study include a small size; a larger study is needed to confirm these findings.
回顾性评估胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者中的应用,并比较实际给予的治疗与TLICS评分预测的治疗方案。
筛查2014年1月至2017年11月期间因急性非创伤性或低暴力性OVCF就诊患者的所有病历,并对符合条件的患者进行回顾性分析。根据磁共振成像(MRI)结果和临床记录确定TLICS评分。对每位患者随访三个月,记录临床记录(包括疼痛评分数据)、影像资料、手术操作及神经学检查的稳定性。
纳入的56例患者中,36例TLICS评分为1分,18例为2分,2例为4分。仅1例TLICS评分为4分的患者接受了手术固定,其余患者采用非手术治疗,包括或不包括椎体后凸成形术。TLICS评分为1分对应单纯压缩骨折,评分为2分对应伴有后凸的爆裂骨折且无神经功能缺损。接受椎体后凸成形术的TLICS评分为1分和2分的患者,两组疼痛评分均有统计学意义的改善;然而,各TLICS评分组(即1分或2分)之间未观察到显著差异。所有患者均未出现不稳定或神经功能恶化。
TLICS评分能正确预测所有OVCF患者的手术或非手术治疗方案选择。TLICS可用于制定治疗决策,以及对这些患者进行手术或非手术评估的分诊。我们的研究表明,TLICS评分为4分或更高的患者需要手术评估,而TLICS评分为1分或2分的患者可能通过强化治疗或保守治疗获得满意的非手术治疗效果。一般而言,OVCF患者的TLICS评分通常较低。椎体后凸成形术在TLICS评分为1分或2分的患者中似乎同样有益。建议对TLICS评分进行修改,增加TLICS零分以纳入伴有水肿的未压缩OVCF。本研究的局限性包括样本量小;需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。