You Wenting, Feng Jun
School of Law, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
School of Biological Sciences and Technology, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong, China.
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 6;15:1363685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363685. eCollection 2024.
Unlike natural conception and other assisted reproductive technologies, surrogacy involves three crucial factors: family legislation, family ethics, and reproductive technology. This makes the determination of parentage in surrogacy more complex. In China, surrogacy is completely prohibited by law. However, this prohibition has not diminished the interest in discussions around the family ethics, order, and relationships affected by surrogacy. In practice, disputes over parentage and child custody arising from surrogacy urgently need resolution through judicial practice. The current legal framework in China lacks clear regulations to address the complexities of surrogacy, leading to numerous unresolved disputes. To address this issue, it is advisable for China to enact clear legislative measures to govern parent-child relationships in surrogacy cases. This paper presents legislative recommendations for regulating surrogacy in China, with the hope that the judicial interpretations of the Supreme People's Court of China can provide clear legal regulations on surrogacy during revisions.
与自然受孕及其他辅助生殖技术不同，代孕涉及家庭立法、家庭伦理和生殖技术这三个关键因素。这使得代孕中的亲子关系认定更为复杂。在中国，法律完全禁止代孕。然而，这一禁令并未减少围绕代孕所影响的家庭伦理、秩序和关系展开讨论的热度。在实践中，代孕引发的亲子关系及子女监护权纠纷亟待通过司法实践予以解决。中国现行法律框架缺乏明确规定来应对代孕的复杂性，导致众多纠纷悬而未决。为解决这一问题，中国宜制定明确的立法措施来规范代孕案件中的亲子关系。本文提出了规范中国代孕行为的立法建议，希望中国最高人民法院在修订司法解释时能就代孕问题提供明确的法律规定。
