Løkkegaard Sille Schandorph, Elmose Mette, Elklit Ask
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2019 May 30;7:39-51. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2019-007. eCollection 2019.
There exist only few developmentally sensitive assessment instruments for identifying posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other potentially comorbid affective and behavioral symptomatology in preschool children. Consequently, young children who exhibit post-trauma symptomatology risk not being identified and not receiving the appropriate treatment. One of the few instruments that exist is the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA).
To examine internal reliability and convergent validity of the Danish version of the DIPA, a semi-structured interview of caregivers about their child's mental health.
In total, 62 caregivers of trauma-exposed children aged 1-6 years were interviewed with the DIPA and completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
The children had experienced between one and eight traumas (Mdn = 3). Based on the DIPA, 48.4% of the children exhibited PTSD. The DIPA showed good to excellent internal consistency for the disorders of major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, separation anxiety disorder and overall internal consistency of PTSD and reactive attachment disorder. Internal consistency was lower for each symptom cluster of PTSD and the overall consistency of sleep disorder with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.54 and 0.69. Correlations between continuous scores of eight disorders of the DIPA and SDQ scales provided support for convergent validity of the DIPA.
The study provides preliminary evidence to support the Danish version of DIPA as a valid measure of symptoms of young children exposed to psychological trauma. As a standardized assessment tool, the DIPA can aid in early and structured assessment of young children exposed to trauma and can help guide treatment for those in need.
用于识别学龄前儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)以及其他可能并存的情感和行为症状的、对发育敏感的评估工具很少。因此,表现出创伤后症状的幼儿有未被识别且未得到适当治疗的风险。现有的少数工具之一是诊断性婴幼儿及学龄前儿童评估量表(DIPA)。
检验丹麦版DIPA(一种针对照顾者关于其孩子心理健康的半结构化访谈)的内部信度和聚合效度。
总共62名1至6岁遭受创伤儿童的照顾者接受了DIPA访谈,并完成了长处与困难问卷(SDQ)。
这些儿童经历了1至8次创伤(中位数 = 3次)。根据DIPA,48.4%的儿童表现出PTSD。DIPA在重度抑郁症、注意力缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍、分离焦虑障碍等疾病方面显示出良好至优秀的内部一致性,以及PTSD和反应性依恋障碍的总体内部一致性。PTSD的每个症状群以及睡眠障碍的总体一致性的内部一致性较低,克朗巴哈系数在0.54至0.69之间。DIPA的八项疾病连续得分与SDQ量表之间的相关性为DIPA的聚合效度提供了支持。
该研究提供了初步证据,支持丹麦版DIPA作为评估遭受心理创伤幼儿症状的有效工具。作为一种标准化评估工具,DIPA有助于对遭受创伤的幼儿进行早期和结构化评估,并可为有需要的儿童提供治疗指导。