Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与咪达唑仑对脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者短期预后的影响。

Effect of propofol versus midazolam on short-term outcomes in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

作者信息

Li Yuanjie, Guo Taipu, Yang Zhenkun, Zhang Rui, Wang Zhi, Li Yize

机构信息

Anesthesiology Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Cardiovascular Disease Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 6;11:1415425. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1415425. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol and midazolam are commonly used sedative drugs in mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). However, there is still a lack of relevant studies exploring the influence of midazolam and propofol on the prognosis of patients with Sepsis-associated Acute Kidney Injury (S-AKI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A statistical analysis was conducted on 3,745 patients with S-AKI in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. The patients' baseline characteristics were grouped based on the use of either propofol or midazolam as sedatives. Cox proportional hazards models, logistic regression models, and subgroup analyses were used to compare the effects of propofol and midazolam on the short-term prognosis of S-AKI patients, including 30-day mortality, ICU mortality, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

In the statistical analysis, a total of 3,745 patients were included, with 649 patients using midazolam and 3,096 patients using propofol. In terms of the 30-day mortality, compared to patients using midazolam, S-AKI patients using propofol had a lower ICU mortality (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.74,  < 0.001), lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.67,  < 0.001), and shorter mechanical ventilation time (odds ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.88,  < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed lower survival probabilities in the midazolam group ( < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that propofol was strongly protective of short-term prognosis in older, male, smaller SOFA score CCI score, no heart failure, and comorbid chronic kidney disease patients with S-AKI.

CONCLUSION

Compared to midazolam, propofol was considered a protective factor for short-term mortality risk and ICU mortality risk in S-AKI patients. Additionally, S-AKI patients using propofol had a lower risk of requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Overall, propofol may be more beneficial for the short-term prognosis of S-AKI patients compared to midazolam.

摘要

背景

丙泊酚和咪达唑仑是重症监护病房(ICU)中机械通气患者常用的镇静药物。然而,仍缺乏相关研究探讨咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤(S-AKI)患者预后的影响。

患者与方法

对重症监护医学信息数据库IV中的3745例S-AKI患者进行统计分析。根据是否使用丙泊酚或咪达唑仑作为镇静剂对患者的基线特征进行分组。使用Cox比例风险模型、逻辑回归模型和亚组分析来比较丙泊酚和咪达唑仑对S-AKI患者短期预后的影响,包括30天死亡率、ICU死亡率和机械通气时间。

结果

在统计分析中,共纳入3745例患者,其中649例使用咪达唑仑,3096例使用丙泊酚。在30天死亡率方面,与使用咪达唑仑的患者相比,使用丙泊酚的S-AKI患者的ICU死亡率较低(风险比=0.62,95%置信区间:0.52-0.74,<0.001),30天死亡率较低(风险比=0.56,95%置信区间:0.47-0.67,<0.001),机械通气时间较短(优势比=0.72,95%置信区间:0.59-0.88,<0.001)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示咪达唑仑组的生存概率较低(<0.001)。亚组分析表明,丙泊酚对年龄较大、男性、SOFA评分和CCI评分较低、无心力衰竭以及合并慢性肾脏病的S-AKI患者的短期预后具有强烈的保护作用。

结论

与咪达唑仑相比,丙泊酚被认为是S-AKI患者短期死亡风险和ICU死亡风险的保护因素。此外,使用丙泊酚的S-AKI患者需要长时间机械通气的风险较低。总体而言,与咪达唑仑相比,丙泊酚可能对S-AKI患者的短期预后更有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验