Suppr超能文献

琼脂稀释法及其在多粘菌素敏感性动态变化中的优缺点

Agar dilution test and its Merits and Drawbacks in evolving dynamics of colistin susceptibility.

作者信息

P R Swathykrishna, Thakuria Bhaskar, Pati Binod Kumar, Kokkayil Prathyusha, Sarfraz Asim

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, Pin: 801507, India.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Sep 3;10(18):e37116. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37116. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Automated results for determining colistin susceptibility tests are unreliable, micro broth dilution requires expertise, and CBDE has limited dilutions. International Consensus Document of 2022 suggested that agar dilution was unacceptable due to varying results in the literature.

METHODS

The study was designed to evaluate the agar dilution method for colistin susceptibility in CRE isolates compared to CBDE. In the study, 108 carbapenem-resistant isolates were tested for Colistin susceptibility by Microbroth Dilution, agar dilution, and colistin broth disc elution. The comparisons were made using various statistical parameters.

RESULTS

The results of the agar dilution method revealed an essential agreement of 75 % and a categorical agreement of 92.5 %. The method showed a sensitivity of 75 % and a specificity of 97.7 %. The positive and negative predictive values were 88.2 % and 94.5 %, respectively. Youden's index was 0.727, indicating a moderate level of accuracy. Meanwhile, CBDE diagnostic accuracy tests were better, with Youden's index at 0.939.

CONCLUSIONS

While CBDE demonstrated better accuracy parameters, it did not offer a broader MIC range. In contrast, agar dilution showed reasonable specificity and reliability for isolates with high MIC. Therefore, we propose using CBDE for screening and agar dilution as a supplementary test in the approach to colistin susceptibility.

摘要

目的

用于确定黏菌素药敏试验的自动化结果不可靠,微量肉汤稀释法需要专业知识,且纸片扩散肉汤稀释法(CBDE)的稀释度有限。2022年国际共识文件指出,由于文献报道结果不一,琼脂稀释法不可接受。

方法

本研究旨在评估与CBDE相比,琼脂稀释法对耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)分离株进行黏菌素药敏试验的效果。在该研究中,通过微量肉汤稀释法、琼脂稀释法和黏菌素肉汤纸片洗脱法对108株耐碳青霉烯类分离株进行黏菌素药敏试验。使用各种统计参数进行比较。

结果

琼脂稀释法结果显示基本一致性为75%,绝对一致性为92.5%。该方法的敏感性为75%,特异性为97.7%。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为88.2%和94.5%。约登指数为0.727,表明准确性处于中等水平。同时,CBDE诊断准确性测试结果更好,约登指数为0.939。

结论

虽然CBDE显示出更好的准确性参数,但它没有提供更宽的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)范围。相比之下,琼脂稀释法对高MIC分离株显示出合理特异性和可靠性。因此,我们建议在黏菌素药敏试验中,采用CBDE进行筛查,琼脂稀释法作为补充试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/226b/11415695/2b523ec63ab7/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验