School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Dr., Boulder, CO 80303, United States; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia St. Reno, NV 89557, United States.
Water Res. 2024 Dec 1;267:122449. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122449. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
Biofilms have been widely detected in water distribution and water storage systems posing potential risks to drinking water safety by harboring and shedding pathogens. Light-based disinfection methods, such as germicidal ultraviolet (UV) and antimicrobial blue light (aBL), could serve as non-chemical alternatives for biofilm control. This study investigated the inactivation of pure-culture Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and mixed-culture biofilms using three distinct light-based disinfection methods: a low-pressure (LP) UV lamp emitting at 254 nm, a UV light emitting diode (LED) at 270 nm, and an aBL LED at 405 nm. The biofilms were developed on three commonly used materials including polycarbonate (PC), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), to assess the impact of surface characteristics on light-based biofilm inactivation. Our findings show that all selected devices can effectively inactivate pure-culture and mixed-culture biofilms. While both UV devices (LP UV lamp and UV LED) provided significant inactivation at lower fluences (>1 log reduction at 20 mJ/cm), aBL LED achieved significant inactivation at higher fluences for pure culture (maximum log reduction of 3.8 ± 0.5 at > 200,000 mJ/cm). Inactivation performance also varied with surface materials, likely attributed to different surface properties including roughness, hydrophobicity, and surface charge. This study provides important information on using light-based technologies for biofilm control and highlights the effect of surface materials on their inactivation performance.
生物膜已广泛存在于供水管网和储水系统中,通过藏匿和释放病原体,对饮用水安全构成潜在威胁。基于光照的消毒方法,如杀菌紫外线(UV)和抗菌蓝光(aBL),可以作为控制生物膜的非化学替代方法。本研究采用三种不同的基于光照的消毒方法,对纯培养铜绿假单胞菌生物膜和混合培养生物膜进行了灭活研究:低压(LP)254nm 紫外线灯、270nm 紫外线发光二极管(LED)和 405nm aBL LED。生物膜在三种常用材料上形成,包括聚碳酸酯(PC)、聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)和聚氯乙烯(PVC),以评估表面特性对基于光照的生物膜灭活的影响。我们的研究结果表明,所有选定的设备都可以有效地灭活纯培养和混合培养生物膜。虽然两种 UV 设备(LP UV 灯和 UV LED)在较低的辐照剂量下(>20mJ/cm2 时可减少 1 个对数级)提供了显著的灭活效果,但 aBL LED 在较高的辐照剂量下对纯培养生物膜的灭活效果更为显著(>200,000mJ/cm2 时最大对数减少 3.8±0.5)。灭活效果还随表面材料的不同而变化,这可能归因于不同的表面特性,包括粗糙度、疏水性和表面电荷。本研究为利用基于光照的技术控制生物膜提供了重要信息,并强调了表面材料对其灭活性能的影响。