Economic effects of next-generation sequencing diagnostics in unspecific sepsis patients - a budget impact analysis from the healthcare providers' perspective in Germany.

PURPOSE

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) tools have clinical advantages over blood culture but are more expensive. This study assesses the budget impact and break-even point of NGS testing costs from a healthcare provider's perspective in Germany.

METHODS

The budget impact was calculated based on aggregated data of German post-operative surgery cases. Simulated cost savings were calculated based on a simulated reduction in hospital length of stay (LOS) of four or eight days with a positivity rate of 71% and compared to the costs of one (scenario A) or two tests (scenario B) per case. Furthermore, the break-even point of the cost of two tests compared to saved costs through shortened LOS was conducted.

RESULTS

For 9,450 cases, an average budget impact for scenario A and scenario B of €1,290.41 [95% CI €1,119.64 - €1,461.19] and - €208.59 [95% CI - €379.36 - - €37.81] was identified for gastrointestinal and kidney surgery cases, and €1,355.58 [95% CI €1,049.62 - €1,661.55] and €18.72 [95% CI - €324.69 - €287.24] for vascular artery surgery cases, respectively. The break-even analysis showed that using two tests per case could achieve a minimum positive contribution margin with an average of 1.9 tests per case across the study population.

CONCLUSION

The results revealed a positive budget impact for one NGS test and a slightly negative budget impact for two NGS tests per case. Findings suggest that largest cost savings are generated for more severe cases and are highly dependent on the patient population.