Andrade Joana, Gomes Hugo Santos, Gonçalves Rui Abrunhosa, Wong Stephen, de Castro Rodrigues Andreia
School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
CJS - Interdisciplinary Research Center on Crime, Justice and Security, School of Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Porto, Portugal.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 8;31(5):896-908. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2230578. eCollection 2024.
This study aims to test the psychometric properties of the Violent Risk Scale (VRS) in a sample of Portuguese remand prisoners. A total of 133 subjects participated in the present study. We carried out a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the originally proposed two factor structure. Results showed evidence to support the VRS's psychometric qualities. The CFA tested the two-factor structure and showed evidence of the goodness of fit of the original two-factor model. Also, our findings indicated acceptable internal consistency for both subscales. The correlational analyses supported both convergent and discriminant validity of the VRS. Finally, this study also tested known-groups validity. The VRS score showed a satisfactory postdictive accuracy, which means that it is able to demonstrate distinctive scores for groups known to vary on the variables being measured. We consider this work represents an essential support for decision-makers to evaluate the appropriateness of different judicial measures.
本研究旨在测试暴力风险量表(VRS)在葡萄牙还押候审囚犯样本中的心理测量特性。共有133名受试者参与了本研究。我们进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)以检验最初提出的两因素结构。结果显示有证据支持VRS的心理测量质量。CFA检验了两因素结构,并显示了原始两因素模型拟合良好的证据。此外,我们的研究结果表明两个子量表的内部一致性均可接受。相关分析支持了VRS的收敛效度和区分效度。最后,本研究还测试了已知群体效度。VRS得分显示出令人满意的预测准确性,这意味着它能够为已知在被测量变量上存在差异的群体显示出不同的分数。我们认为这项工作为决策者评估不同司法措施的适当性提供了重要支持。