Voorhuijzen-Harink Marleen M, Fronen Bas J, Willemsen Linda, Koops Andries, Hoek-van den Hil Elise F, Smits Nathalie G E
Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(17):e36824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36824. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
For correct allergen risk management by industry, retail and food safety authorities, sensitive and reliable fast allergen detection methods are required, even more when precautionary allergen labelling based on reference doses will be implemented in legislation. This study aimed to perform a comparative assessment of three commercially available quantitative or qualitative test kits, for DNA analysis of celery in food products. Five product groups, representing different sectors of the AOAC food-matrix triangle, being (plant-based) meat products, snacks, sauces, dried herbs and spices, and smoothies, were identified to potentially contain celery. From each group, blank and incurred (labelled to contain celery) food products were selected, of which the blank food products were additionally spiked with low protein levels of celery prior to qPCR assessment. Results show that the assessed test kits perform according to their specifications, however, a clear influence of the matrix on the detection ability of celery was observed. In addition, quantification of the amount of celery in the different food products showed to be challenging in all food product groups using the two quantification kits.
为了让食品行业、零售商和食品安全监管部门正确地进行过敏原风险管理,需要灵敏且可靠的快速过敏原检测方法,尤其是当基于参考剂量的预防性过敏原标签将在法规中实施时。本研究旨在对三种市售的定量或定性检测试剂盒进行比较评估,用于食品中芹菜的DNA分析。确定了五个代表AOAC食品基质三角不同部分的产品组,即(植物性)肉类产品、零食、调味汁、干草药和香料以及奶昔,它们可能含有芹菜。从每个组中选择空白食品和含芹菜的食品(标签标明含有芹菜),其中空白食品在进行qPCR评估之前还添加了低蛋白水平的芹菜。结果表明,所评估的检测试剂盒符合其规格要求,然而,观察到基质对芹菜检测能力有明显影响。此外,使用两种定量试剂盒对不同食品中芹菜含量进行定量分析在所有食品组中都具有挑战性。