Department of General Practice & Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Social & Community Health, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;16(3):243-249. doi: 10.1071/HC23107.
Introduction Sexual orientation minorities have worse health outcomes than the heterosexual majority. In 2023, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) added sexual and gender identity items to the Census, offering actionable data for improving sexual identity and gender identity (SOGI) community health. However, this also raises questions about individuals' willingness to provide such information to Government and their comfort with data privacy and governance. Methods Using data from gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) participants of the Gay Auckland Periodic Sex Survey and Gay Men's Online Sex Survey 2014 cross-sectional surveys, the study question examined comfort having their sexual orientation recorded in official databases. A logistic regression model was used to identify independent predictors of comfort, including sociodemographic and behavioural variables. Results Of 3173 participants who completed the question, 63.1% were comfortable with recording sexual orientation. Adjusted odds ratios showed less comfort among those identifying with an 'Other' ethnicity (AOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.96), identifying as bisexual (AOR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.56), and those who did not believe their GP to be aware of their sexuality (AOR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.26-0.40). No sexual behaviours were independently associated with comfort. Discussion The majority of GBM participants reported comfort with having their sexual orientation recorded on official databases, but some are not, and this is patterned by sociodemographic variables. Officials should improve the safety and perceived relevance of sexual orientation data collection efforts to increase their representativeness and utility for sexual minority populations.
引言
性取向少数群体的健康状况比异性恋多数群体差。2023 年,新西兰(NZ)在人口普查中增加了性取向和性别认同项目,为改善性身份和性别认同(SOGI)社区健康提供了可操作的数据。然而,这也引发了人们对个人向政府提供此类信息的意愿以及对数据隐私和治理的舒适度的问题。
方法
使用来自 Gay Auckland Periodic Sex Survey 和 Gay Men's Online Sex Survey 2014 横断面调查的男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性(GBM)参与者的数据,研究问题考察了在官方数据库中记录性取向的舒适度。使用逻辑回归模型确定舒适度的独立预测因素,包括社会人口统计学和行为变量。
结果
在完成该问题的 3173 名参与者中,有 63.1%的人对记录性取向感到舒适。调整后的优势比显示,那些认同“其他”族裔(AOR:0.64,95%CI:0.43-0.96)、认同双性恋(AOR:0.45,95%CI:0.35-0.56)和认为他们的全科医生不知道他们的性取向(AOR:0.32,95%CI:0.26-0.40)的人舒适度较低。没有性行为与舒适度独立相关。
讨论
大多数 GBM 参与者报告对在官方数据库中记录其性取向感到舒适,但有些人则不然,这与社会人口统计学变量有关。官员应提高性取向数据收集工作的安全性和相关性,以提高其代表性和对性少数群体的实用性。