• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在军事艰苦环境中,普通外科医师助理在非压迫性腹部出血管理方面达成协议的共识:一项德尔菲研究。

Gaining consensus on a protocol for general surgery physician assistants in the management of non-compressible abdominal haemorrhage in military austere environments: a Delphi study.

机构信息

Translational Health Science, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e088159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088159.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088159
PMID:39322592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426011/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-compressible abdominal haemorrhage (NCAH) is a potentially preventable cause of death due to injury. Limited exploratory laparotomy by a non-surgeon is a temporary intervention to sustain life until definitive surgical intervention by trauma surgeons can be obtained. This study aims to establish consensus on a protocol for general surgery physician assistants performing limited exploratory laparotomy to manage NCAH in an austere environment.

METHOD

This study included anonymised trauma surgeons and general surgery physician assistants from military and civilian backgrounds. Participants were recruited from various professional surgical organisations, including direct interaction with trauma surgeons and surgical physician assistants. Participants used a modified Delphi survey with a 9-point Likert scale in two rounds. The two surveys were categorised into three parts: protocol for NCAH (part A), the potential role of general surgery physician assistants (part B) and measures of success (part C). A total of 24 statements were voted on and assessed. Votes were divided into three zones: agreement (median 7-9), uncertain (median 4-6) and disagreement (median 1-3). To reach a consensus, 70% agreement was required within a zone. If more than 30% of the votes fell outside of a specific zone, consensus was not achieved. After consensus, the original protocol was revised in an online meeting with experts.

RESULTS

The initial analysis involved 29 participants. After 2 survey rounds, 19 out of 24 statements reached a consensus. Part A: 10 statements gained consensus, including in austere environments, controlling NCAH can be challenging. A qualified general surgery physician assistant should intervene. A focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination can be used for screening. Bleeding can be managed with packing and pressure. After managing the haemorrhage, the abdominal wall should be left open with a temporary closure technique. Part B: nine statements gained consensus, including in austere locations, a licensed general surgery physician assistant with a minimum of 3 years of experience working under the supervision of a trauma/general surgeon can perform interventions for limited exploratory laparotomy for patients with NCAH. Part C: general surgery physician assistants will be required to have the same success rates as any qualified surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Gaining consensus and implementing a revised protocol for managing NCAH by general surgery physician assistants is attainable. General surgery physician assistants will need formal training to manage NCAH. With the support of trauma surgeons who provide direct and indirect supervision, general surgery physician assistants can develop a comprehensive understanding of the necessary skills and make sound decisions when treating patients with this condition. This teamwork can also increase surgical capacity and potentially decrease mortality rates for patients with NCAH in austere environments.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ff/11426011/e8568f79c6f4/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ff/11426011/e8568f79c6f4/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38ff/11426011/e8568f79c6f4/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
摘要

背景

非压缩性腹部出血(NCAH)是一种由于外伤导致的潜在可预防的死亡原因。非外科医生进行有限的剖腹探查术是一种临时干预措施,可维持生命,直到创伤外科医生能够进行确定性手术干预。本研究旨在就普通外科医生助理在恶劣环境下进行有限剖腹探查术以治疗 NCAH 达成协议。

方法

这项研究包括来自军事和民用背景的匿名创伤外科医生和普通外科医生助理。参与者是从各种专业外科组织中招募的,包括与创伤外科医生和外科医生助理的直接互动。参与者使用改良 Delphi 调查法,采用 9 分 Likert 量表进行两轮调查。两轮调查分为三个部分:NCAH 方案(第 A 部分)、普通外科医生助理的潜在作用(第 B 部分)和成功措施(第 C 部分)。共有 24 项声明进行了投票和评估。投票分为三个区域:同意(中位数 7-9)、不确定(中位数 4-6)和不同意(中位数 1-3)。要达成共识,需要在一个区域内获得 70%的同意。如果超过 30%的投票落在特定区域之外,则无法达成共识。达成共识后,在与专家的在线会议上修订了原始方案。

结果

最初的分析涉及 29 名参与者。经过两轮调查,24 项声明中有 19 项达成了共识。第 A 部分:有 10 项声明达成共识,包括在恶劣环境下,控制 NCAH 具有挑战性。合格的普通外科医生助理应进行干预。创伤超声检查可用于筛查。可以通过填塞和加压来控制出血。在处理出血后,应使用临时闭合技术将腹壁敞开。第 B 部分:有 9 项声明达成共识,包括在恶劣地点,具有 3 年以上在创伤/普通外科医生监督下工作经验的持牌普通外科医生助理可以为 NCAH 患者进行有限剖腹探查术干预。第 C 部分:普通外科医生助理需要达到与任何合格外科医生相同的成功率。

结论

普通外科医生助理管理 NCAH 的协议可以达成共识并进行修订。普通外科医生助理需要接受正式培训才能管理 NCAH。在提供直接和间接监督的创伤外科医生的支持下,普通外科医生助理可以全面了解必要的技能,并在治疗此类患者时做出明智的决策。这种团队合作还可以提高在恶劣环境中治疗 NCAH 的患者的手术能力,并可能降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
Gaining consensus on a protocol for general surgery physician assistants in the management of non-compressible abdominal haemorrhage in military austere environments: a Delphi study.在军事艰苦环境中,普通外科医师助理在非压迫性腹部出血管理方面达成协议的共识:一项德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e088159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088159.
2
Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere environments: a scoping review.平民和军事艰苦环境下腹部不可压缩性躯干出血的管理:一项范围综述
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Feb 14;9(1):e001189. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001189. eCollection 2024.
3
Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere/remote environments: protocol for a scoping review.平民和军事严峻/偏远环境下腹部不可压缩性躯干出血的管理:范围审查方案
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Oct 19;6(1):e000811. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000811. eCollection 2021.
4
Blunt Abdominal Trauma in a European Trauma Setting: Need for Complex or Non-Complex Skills in Emergency Laparotomy.钝性腹部创伤在欧洲创伤环境下:急诊剖腹手术需要复杂技能还是非复杂技能。
Scand J Surg. 2020 Jun;109(2):89-95. doi: 10.1177/1457496919828244. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Young surgeons' perspectives on surgical anatomy teaching: Insights from a Delphi study.年轻外科医生对外科解剖学教学的看法:德尔菲研究的见解
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 May;309:126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.039. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
6
Consensus guidelines on the bedside assistant skills required in robotic surgery.机器人手术中所需床旁助手技能的共识指南。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6406-6412. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11206-x. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
Consensus Statements on the Definition, Classification, and Diagnostic Tests for Tinnitus: A Delphi Study Conducted by the Korean Tinnitus Study Group.关于耳鸣定义、分类和诊断测试的共识声明:由韩国耳鸣研究组进行的德尔菲研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Feb 5;39(5):e49. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e49.
8
International consensus recommendations for the optimal prioritisation and distribution of surgical services in low-income and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi process.国际共识建议:优化中低收入国家的手术服务优先级和分配:改良 Delphi 法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):e062687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062687.
9
Non-therapeutic laparotomies in military trauma (2009-2014).非治疗性剖腹手术在军事创伤中的应用(2009-2014 年)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5778-5784. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11102-4. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
10
Colombian Consensus on the Treatment of Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).哥伦比亚胎盘植入症谱(PAS)治疗共识。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2022 Sep 30;73(3):283-316. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3877.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere environments: a scoping review.平民和军事艰苦环境下腹部不可压缩性躯干出血的管理:一项范围综述
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Feb 14;9(1):e001189. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001189. eCollection 2024.
2
PROTOCOL: Evidence-informed practice versus evidence-based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding, and behavior toward the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of undergraduate students.方案:基于证据的实践与循证实践教育干预措施对提高本科生将证据应用于实践的知识、态度、理解和行为的影响:一项全面的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 23;15(1-2):e1015. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1015. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Task Shifting and Task Sharing Implementation in Africa: A Scoping Review on Rationale and Scope.非洲任务转移与任务分担的实施:关于基本原理和范围的综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;11(8):1200. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081200.
4
Austere Resuscitative and Surgical Care in Support of Forward Military Operations-Joint Trauma System Position Paper.支持前方军事行动的简易复苏与外科护理——联合创伤系统立场文件
Mil Med. 2021 Jan 30;186(1-2):12-17. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa358.
5
Surgical Task-Sharing to Non-specialist Physicians in Low-Resource Settings Globally: A Systematic Review of the Literature.全球资源匮乏环境下非专业医师外科手术分工:文献系统回顾
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1368-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05363-7.
6
Development of transfusion guidelines for injured children using a Modified Delphi Consensus Process.运用改良德尔菲共识程序制定创伤儿童输血指南。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):935-943. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002432.
7
Task Shifting in Surgery-What US Health Care Can Learn From Ghana.外科手术中的任务转移——美国医疗保健可从加纳学到的经验。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):860. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1745.
8
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: current evidence.主动脉内复苏性血管球囊阻断术:当前证据
Open Access Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 14;11:29-38. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S166087. eCollection 2019.
9
Advanced Resuscitative Care in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Guidelines Change 18-01:14 October 2018.战术战斗伤员救治中的高级复苏护理:TCCC指南变更18-01:2018年10月14日
J Spec Oper Med. 2018 Winter;18(4):37-55. doi: 10.55460/YJB8-ZC0Y.
10
Methods for Early Control of Abdominal Hemorrhage: An Assessment of Potential Benefit.腹部出血早期控制方法:潜在益处评估
J Spec Oper Med. 2018 Summer;18(2):98-104. doi: 10.55460/I0EU-SQE7.