• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型全国连锁药店患者的 COVID-19 检测中的健康公平性。

Health equity in COVID-19 testing among patients of a large national pharmacy chain.

机构信息

Walgreen Co, Deerfield, IL, United States.

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 11;12:1422914. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422914. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422914
PMID:39324167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11423355/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several social determinants of health and other structural factors drive racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 risk, morbidity, and mortality. Public-private collaborations with community pharmacies have been successful in expanding access to COVID-19 testing and reaching historically underserved communities. The objectives of this study were to describe individuals who sought testing for COVID-19 at a national community pharmacy chain and to understand potential racial and ethnic inequities in testing access, positivity, and infection with emerging variants of concern.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of individuals aged ≥18 who were tested for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) at a Walgreens pharmacy or Walgreen-affiliated mass testing site between May 1, 2021 and February 28, 2022. Positivity was defined as the proportion of positive tests among all administered tests. A geographically balanced random subset of positive tests underwent whole genome sequencing to identify specific viral variants (alpha, delta, and omicron). Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the likelihood of testing positive and testing positive with an emerging variant of concern across race and ethnicity groups.

RESULTS

A total of 18,576,360 tests were analyzed (16.0% tests were positive for COVID-19; 59.5% of tests were from White individuals and 13.1% were from Black individuals). American Indian or Alaska Native (OR = 1.12; 95%CI = 1.10-1.13), Hispanic or Latino (1.20; 95%CI = 1.120, 1.21), and Black (1.12; 95%CI = 1.12, 1.13) individuals were more likely to test positive for COVID-19 compared to White individuals. Non-White individuals were also more likely to test positive for emerging variants of concern (e.g., Black individuals were 3.34 (95%CI = 3.14-3.56) times more likely to test positive for omicron compared to White individuals during the transition period from delta to omicron).

DISCUSSION

Using a national database of testing data, we found racial and ethnic differences in the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 and testing positive for emerging viral strains. These results demonstrate the feasibility of public-private collaborations with local pharmacies and pharmacy chains to support pandemic response and reach harder to reach populations with important health services.

摘要

背景

多种健康社会决定因素和其他结构性因素导致了 COVID-19 风险、发病率和死亡率方面的种族和民族差异。公私合作与社区药店合作,成功扩大了 COVID-19 检测的获取途径,并覆盖到了历史上服务不足的社区。本研究的目的是描述在全国连锁药店寻求 COVID-19 检测的个体,并了解在检测获取、阳性率和新兴关注变异体感染方面可能存在的种族和民族差异。

方法

我们对 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 28 日期间在沃尔格林药店或沃尔格林附属大规模检测点接受 COVID-19(SARS-CoV-2)检测的年龄≥18 岁的个体进行了一项横断面研究。阳性定义为阳性检测在所有检测中的比例。对阳性检测的一个地理平衡随机亚组进行全基因组测序,以确定特定的病毒变异体(alpha、delta 和 omicron)。Logistic 回归估计了比值比(ORs)和 95%置信区间(CIs),以比较不同种族和民族群体检测阳性和检测到新兴关注变异体的可能性。

结果

共分析了 18576360 次检测(16.0%的检测呈 COVID-19 阳性;59.5%的检测来自白人个体,13.1%的检测来自黑人个体)。美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(OR=1.12;95%CI=1.10-1.13)、西班牙裔或拉丁裔(1.20;95%CI=1.120,1.21)和黑人(1.12;95%CI=1.12,1.13)个体与白人个体相比,更有可能检测出 COVID-19 阳性。非白人个体也更有可能检测到新兴关注变异体(例如,在 delta 向 omicron 过渡期间,黑人个体检测出 omicron 的可能性是白人个体的 3.34 倍[95%CI=3.14-3.56])。

讨论

利用全国性的检测数据数据库,我们发现了种族和民族在 COVID-19 检测阳性率和新兴病毒株检测阳性率方面的差异。这些结果表明,公私合作与当地药店和连锁药店合作,支持大流行应对并为重要卫生服务覆盖更难到达的人群是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcf9/11423355/18c2c1ad9d21/fpubh-12-1422914-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcf9/11423355/18c2c1ad9d21/fpubh-12-1422914-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcf9/11423355/18c2c1ad9d21/fpubh-12-1422914-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Health equity in COVID-19 testing among patients of a large national pharmacy chain.大型全国连锁药店患者的 COVID-19 检测中的健康公平性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 11;12:1422914. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422914. eCollection 2024.
2
Racial and ethnic inequities in spatial access to pharmacies: A geographic information system analysis.种族和民族在获得药房方面的空间不平等:地理信息系统分析。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 Jul-Aug;64(4):102131. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102131. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Cancer Care Continuity During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Those With SARS-CoV-2.新冠疫情期间,SARS-CoV-2 感染者的癌症诊疗连续性中的种族和民族差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412050. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12050.
4
Patterns of COVID-19 testing and mortality by race and ethnicity among United States veterans: A nationwide cohort study.美国退伍军人中按种族和民族划分的 COVID-19 检测和死亡率模式:一项全国性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 22;17(9):e1003379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003379. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Health Center Testing for SARS-CoV-2 During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, June 5-October 2, 2020.新冠病毒大流行期间健康中心对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测-美国,2020 年 6 月 5 日至 10 月 2 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 18;69(50):1895-1901. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950a3.
6
SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities.北卡罗来纳州的 SARS-CoV-2 检测:种族、民族和地理差异。
Health Place. 2021 May;69:102576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102576. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Disparities in COVID-19 testing and outcomes among Asian American and Pacific Islanders: an observational study in a large health care system.美国亚裔和太平洋岛民群体在新冠病毒检测和结果方面的差异:在一个大型医疗保健系统中的观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15089-w.
8
COVID-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in US Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas, March 2020 to February 2022.2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月美国大都市和非大都市地区按种族和族裔划分的 COVID-19 死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2311098. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11098.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Age-Specific All-Cause Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠大流行期间特定年龄段全因死亡率的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38918.
10
COVID-19 treatment resource disparities and social disadvantage in New York City.纽约市 COVID-19 治疗资源差距与社会劣势。
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106282. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106282. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic phase-related racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 positivity and outcomes among patients presenting to emergency departments during the first two pandemic waves in the USA.美国前两波疫情期间,急诊科就诊患者中 COVID-19 阳性率和结局的大流行阶段相关种族和民族差异。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Mar 21;41(4):201-209. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213101.
2
Disparities in COVID-19 related outcomes in the United States by race and ethnicity pre-vaccination era: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.疫苗接种前时代美国按种族和民族划分的 COVID-19 相关结局差异:荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1206988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206988. eCollection 2023.
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 booster vaccination among U.S. older adults differ by geographic region and Medicare enrollment.
美国老年人 COVID-19 加强针接种的种族和民族差异因地理区域和医疗保险登记而异。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 10;11:1243958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1243958. eCollection 2023.
4
Estimated vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron infections among health care workers and the general adult population in Norway, August 2021 - January 2022.2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 1 月期间,挪威医护人员和普通成年人群体中针对 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔和奥密克戎感染的疫苗有效性估计。
Vaccine. 2023 Jun 13;41(26):3923-3929. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.022. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Vaccination Status and Trends in Adult Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Hospitalizations by Race and Ethnicity: March 2020-August 2022.疫苗接种状况和成人 2019 冠状病毒病相关住院率的种族和民族趋势:2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 8 月。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 18;77(6):827-838. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad266.
6
Geographic disparities in COVID-19 testing and outcomes in Florida.佛罗里达州 COVID-19 检测和结果的地域差异。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14450-9.
7
Geographic Accessibility of COVID-19 Test to Treat Sites by Race, Ethnicity, Age, and Rurality.按种族、族裔、年龄和农村地区划分的新冠病毒检测治疗点的地理可达性
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2241144. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41144.
8
Inequities in spatial accessibility to COVID-19 testing in 30 large US cities.美国 30 大城市 COVID-19 检测空间可达性的不平等。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;310:115307. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115307. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
9
Access to community pharmacies: A nationwide geographic information systems cross-sectional analysis.社区药房可及性:全国性地理信息系统横断面分析。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Nov-Dec;62(6):1816-1822.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
10
Use of At-Home COVID-19 Tests - United States, August 23, 2021-March 12, 2022.家庭版 COVID-19 检测的使用情况-美国,2021 年 8 月 23 日-2022 年 3 月 12 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 1;71(13):489-494. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e1.