Suppr超能文献

美国 30 大城市 COVID-19 检测空间可达性的不平等。

Inequities in spatial accessibility to COVID-19 testing in 30 large US cities.

机构信息

Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health, 3600 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.

Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health, 3600 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;310:115307. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115307. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

Abstract

Testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a key strategy to mitigate and control the COVID-19 pandemic. Wide spatial and racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 outcomes have emerged in US cities. Previous research has highlighted the role of unequal access to testing as a potential driver of these disparities. We described inequities in spatial accessibility to COVID-19 testing locations in 30 large US cities. We used location data from Castlight Health Inc corresponding to October 2021. We created an accessibility metric at the level of the census block group (CBG) based on the number of sites per population in a 15-minute walkshed around the centroid of each CBG. We also calculated spatial accessibility using only testing sites without restrictions, i.e., no requirement for an appointment or a physician order prior to testing. We measured the association between the social vulnerability index (SVI) and spatial accessibility using a multilevel negative binomial model with random city intercepts and random SVI slopes. Among the 27,195 CBG analyzed, 53% had at least one testing site within a 15-minute walkshed, and 36% had at least one site without restrictions. On average, a 1-decile increase in the SVI was associated with a 3% (95% Confidence Interval: 2% - 4%) lower accessibility. Spatial inequities were similar across various components of the SVI and for sites with no restrictions. Despite this general pattern, several cities had inverted inequity, i.e., better accessibility in more vulnerable areas, which indicates that some cities may be on the right track when it comes to promoting equity in COVID-19 testing. Testing is a key component of the strategy to mitigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and efforts should be made to improve accessibility to testing, particularly as new and more contagious variants become dominant.

摘要

检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染一直是减轻和控制 COVID-19 大流行的关键策略。美国城市的 COVID-19 结果存在广泛的空间和种族/族裔差异。先前的研究强调了检测机会不平等是造成这些差异的潜在驱动因素之一。我们描述了 30 个美国大城市中 COVID-19 检测点的空间可达性的不公平现象。我们使用了 Castlight Health Inc 的位置数据,对应于 2021 年 10 月。我们基于每个 CBG 质心周围 15 分钟步行距离内的人口站点数,在人口普查区组(CBG)级别创建了一个可达性指标。我们还仅使用没有限制的检测点计算了空间可达性,即无需在检测前预约或有医生医嘱。我们使用具有随机城市截距和随机 SVI 斜率的多层负二项模型,衡量社会脆弱性指数(SVI)与空间可达性之间的关联。在所分析的 27,195 个 CBG 中,53%的 CBG 在 15 分钟步行距离内至少有一个检测点,36%的 CBG 至少有一个没有限制的检测点。平均而言,SVI 增加一个十进制数与可达性降低 3%(95%置信区间:2%-4%)相关。SVI 的各个组成部分和没有限制的检测点的空间不公平现象相似。尽管存在这种普遍模式,但仍有几个城市存在不平等现象的反转,即脆弱地区的可达性更好,这表明在促进 COVID-19 检测公平性方面,一些城市可能已经走在了正确的道路上。检测是减轻 SARS-CoV-2 传播策略的关键组成部分,应努力提高检测的可达性,特别是随着新的、更具传染性的变体占主导地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/9420026/da2fdcadda08/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验