• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The corpus callosum and creativity revisited.胼胝体与创造力再探讨。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 12;18:1443970. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443970. eCollection 2024.
2
Split-brain, the right hemisphere, and art: fact and fiction.裂脑、右脑与艺术:事实与虚构。
Prog Brain Res. 2013;204:3-17. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63287-6.00001-4.
3
Creativity and the corpus callosum.创造力与胼胝体。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1988 Sep;11(3):293-301.
4
Hemispheric connectivity and the visual-spatial divergent-thinking component of creativity.半球连接性与创造力的视觉空间发散思维成分。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Aug;70(3):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
Hemispheric specialization and creativity.半球特化与创造力。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1988 Sep;11(3):303-15.
6
Paradoxically greater interhemispheric transfer deficits in partial than complete callosal agenesis.矛盾的是,部分胼胝体发育不全比完全胼胝体发育不全存在更大的半球间传递缺陷。
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Oct;36(10):1015-24. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00055-4.
7
Brain plasticity following corpus callosum agenesis or loss: a review of the Probst bundles.胼胝体发育不全或缺失后的脑可塑性:Probst束综述
Front Neuroanat. 2023 Nov 6;17:1296779. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1296779. eCollection 2023.
8
Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong.45年的裂脑研究,且仍在蓬勃发展。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Aug;6(8):653-9. doi: 10.1038/nrn1723.
9
How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review.胼胝体如何介导大脑两半球间的信息传递?综述。
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Sep 30;223(1):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
10
The Evolution of Corpus Callosotomy for Epilepsy Management.胼胝体切开术治疗癫痫的演变。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.178. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaginative elaboration in agenesis of the corpus callosum: topic modeling and perplexity.胼胝体发育不全的想象性阐述:主题建模与困惑度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Aug;30(7):643-650. doi: 10.1017/S1355617724000183. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Structural properties of corpus callosum are associated differently with verbal creativity and visual creativity.胼胝体的结构特性与言语创造力和视觉创造力的关联方式不同。
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Nov;226(8):2511-2521. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02329-1. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Social Inferences in Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum and Autism: Semantic Analysis and Topic Modeling.胼胝体发育不全与自闭症的社会推理:语义分析与主题建模。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Feb;52(2):569-583. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04957-2. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Appreciation of Social Norms in Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.胼胝体发育不全患者的社会规范认知
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct 13;36(7):1367-1373. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab003.
5
Brain functional connectivity in individuals with callosotomy and agenesis of the corpus callosum: A systematic review.胼胝体切开术和胼胝体发育不全患者的脑功能连接:系统评价。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Oct;105:231-248. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
6
The Neuropsychological Syndrome of Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.胼胝体发育不全的神经心理学综合征。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Mar;25(3):324-330. doi: 10.1017/S135561771800111X. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Awareness of consequences in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Semantic analysis of responses.胼胝体发育不全后果的认知:反应的语义分析
Neuropsychology. 2019 Feb;33(2):275-284. doi: 10.1037/neu0000512. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Matrix Tests.基质测试。
Ment Health (Lond). 1940 Jan;1(1):10-18.
9
An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics.主题建模概述及其在生物信息学中的当前应用。
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 20;5(1):1608. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3252-8. eCollection 2016.
10
The Contribution of the Corpus Callosum to Language Lateralization.胼胝体对语言功能偏侧化的作用。
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 20;36(16):4522-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3850-14.2016.

胼胝体与创造力再探讨。

The corpus callosum and creativity revisited.

作者信息

Brown Warren S, Paul Lynn K

机构信息

Travis Research Institute, Fuller School of Psychology & Marriage and Family Therapy, Pasadena, CA, United States.

International Research Consortium for the Corpus Callosum and Cerebral Connectivity (IRC5), Pasadena, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 12;18:1443970. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443970. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443970
PMID:39328385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11424518/
Abstract

In 1969 Joseph Bogen, a colleague of Roger Sperry and the neurosurgeon who performed commissurotomy on Sperry's "split-brain" study participants, wrote an article subtitled "The Corpus Callosum and Creativity." The article argued for the critical role of the corpus callosum and hemispheric specialization in creativity. Building on a four-stage model of creativity (learning, incubation, illumination, refinement) and Sperry's innovative studies, the Bogens posited that in the intact brain, creativity relies on two opposing functions of the corpus callosum: (a) interhemispheric inhibition to facilitate simultaneous and independent activity of uniquely-specialized processing centers during and and (b) interhemispheric facilitation to support the increased bi-hemispheric integration and coordination which produces This article revisits the Bogens' theory considering scientific discoveries over the past 50 years. We begin by reviewing relevant findings from split-brain studies, and then briefly consider findings from studies that examine the association of creativity with callosal structure and function in neurotypical participants. Finally, we provide an in-depth discussion of creativity in persons with (ACC)-the congenital absence of the corpus callosum. These three lines of inquiry strongly support the theory suggested by Bogen and Bogen in 1969 and provide further clarification regarding the critical and unique role of the corpus callosum in creative cognition.

摘要

1969年,罗杰·斯佩里的同事约瑟夫·博根撰写了一篇题为《胼胝体与创造力》的文章。博根是一名神经外科医生,曾为斯佩里“裂脑”研究的参与者实施连合部切开术。该文章论证了胼胝体和半球特化在创造力中的关键作用。基于创造力的四阶段模型(学习、酝酿、顿悟、完善)以及斯佩里的创新性研究,博根夫妇假定,在完整的大脑中,创造力依赖于胼胝体的两种相反功能:(a)半球间抑制,以促进在学习和酝酿阶段独特专门化处理中心的同时且独立的活动;(b)半球间促进,以支持增强的双半球整合与协调,从而产生顿悟。本文结合过去50年的科学发现重新审视了博根夫妇的理论。我们首先回顾裂脑研究的相关发现,然后简要考虑在神经典型参与者中考察创造力与胼胝体结构和功能关联的研究结果。最后,我们深入讨论了胼胝体缺如(ACC)患者的创造力,即先天性胼胝体缺失。这三条研究线索有力地支持了博根夫妇在1969年提出的理论,并进一步阐明了胼胝体在创造性认知中的关键且独特的作用。