Suppr超能文献

胼胝体与创造力再探讨。

The corpus callosum and creativity revisited.

作者信息

Brown Warren S, Paul Lynn K

机构信息

Travis Research Institute, Fuller School of Psychology & Marriage and Family Therapy, Pasadena, CA, United States.

International Research Consortium for the Corpus Callosum and Cerebral Connectivity (IRC5), Pasadena, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 12;18:1443970. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443970. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In 1969 Joseph Bogen, a colleague of Roger Sperry and the neurosurgeon who performed commissurotomy on Sperry's "split-brain" study participants, wrote an article subtitled "The Corpus Callosum and Creativity." The article argued for the critical role of the corpus callosum and hemispheric specialization in creativity. Building on a four-stage model of creativity (learning, incubation, illumination, refinement) and Sperry's innovative studies, the Bogens posited that in the intact brain, creativity relies on two opposing functions of the corpus callosum: (a) interhemispheric inhibition to facilitate simultaneous and independent activity of uniquely-specialized processing centers during and and (b) interhemispheric facilitation to support the increased bi-hemispheric integration and coordination which produces This article revisits the Bogens' theory considering scientific discoveries over the past 50 years. We begin by reviewing relevant findings from split-brain studies, and then briefly consider findings from studies that examine the association of creativity with callosal structure and function in neurotypical participants. Finally, we provide an in-depth discussion of creativity in persons with (ACC)-the congenital absence of the corpus callosum. These three lines of inquiry strongly support the theory suggested by Bogen and Bogen in 1969 and provide further clarification regarding the critical and unique role of the corpus callosum in creative cognition.

摘要

1969年,罗杰·斯佩里的同事约瑟夫·博根撰写了一篇题为《胼胝体与创造力》的文章。博根是一名神经外科医生,曾为斯佩里“裂脑”研究的参与者实施连合部切开术。该文章论证了胼胝体和半球特化在创造力中的关键作用。基于创造力的四阶段模型(学习、酝酿、顿悟、完善)以及斯佩里的创新性研究,博根夫妇假定,在完整的大脑中,创造力依赖于胼胝体的两种相反功能:(a)半球间抑制,以促进在学习和酝酿阶段独特专门化处理中心的同时且独立的活动;(b)半球间促进,以支持增强的双半球整合与协调,从而产生顿悟。本文结合过去50年的科学发现重新审视了博根夫妇的理论。我们首先回顾裂脑研究的相关发现,然后简要考虑在神经典型参与者中考察创造力与胼胝体结构和功能关联的研究结果。最后,我们深入讨论了胼胝体缺如(ACC)患者的创造力,即先天性胼胝体缺失。这三条研究线索有力地支持了博根夫妇在1969年提出的理论,并进一步阐明了胼胝体在创造性认知中的关键且独特的作用。

相似文献

1
The corpus callosum and creativity revisited.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 12;18:1443970. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443970. eCollection 2024.
2
Split-brain, the right hemisphere, and art: fact and fiction.
Prog Brain Res. 2013;204:3-17. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63287-6.00001-4.
3
Creativity and the corpus callosum.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1988 Sep;11(3):293-301.
4
Hemispheric connectivity and the visual-spatial divergent-thinking component of creativity.
Brain Cogn. 2009 Aug;70(3):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
Hemispheric specialization and creativity.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1988 Sep;11(3):303-15.
6
Paradoxically greater interhemispheric transfer deficits in partial than complete callosal agenesis.
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Oct;36(10):1015-24. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00055-4.
7
Brain plasticity following corpus callosum agenesis or loss: a review of the Probst bundles.
Front Neuroanat. 2023 Nov 6;17:1296779. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1296779. eCollection 2023.
8
Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Aug;6(8):653-9. doi: 10.1038/nrn1723.
9
How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review.
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Sep 30;223(1):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
10
The Evolution of Corpus Callosotomy for Epilepsy Management.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.178. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaginative elaboration in agenesis of the corpus callosum: topic modeling and perplexity.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Aug;30(7):643-650. doi: 10.1017/S1355617724000183. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Structural properties of corpus callosum are associated differently with verbal creativity and visual creativity.
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Nov;226(8):2511-2521. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02329-1. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Social Inferences in Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum and Autism: Semantic Analysis and Topic Modeling.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Feb;52(2):569-583. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04957-2. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Appreciation of Social Norms in Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Oct 13;36(7):1367-1373. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab003.
5
Brain functional connectivity in individuals with callosotomy and agenesis of the corpus callosum: A systematic review.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Oct;105:231-248. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
6
The Neuropsychological Syndrome of Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Mar;25(3):324-330. doi: 10.1017/S135561771800111X. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Awareness of consequences in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Semantic analysis of responses.
Neuropsychology. 2019 Feb;33(2):275-284. doi: 10.1037/neu0000512. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Matrix Tests.
Ment Health (Lond). 1940 Jan;1(1):10-18.
9
An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics.
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 20;5(1):1608. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3252-8. eCollection 2016.
10
The Contribution of the Corpus Callosum to Language Lateralization.
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 20;36(16):4522-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3850-14.2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验