Suppr超能文献

北美执业过敏症专科医生对支气管扩张剂反应性测试中的无菌技术进行评估。

Assessing sterility techniques in bronchodilator responsiveness testing by practicing allergists in North America.

作者信息

Chhabra Kabir, Gupta Dhruva, Singh Neel, Sharif Naba, Sekhsaria Sudhir

机构信息

University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Aug 22;3(4):100325. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100325. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Thoracic Society has published general guidelines for sterility when testing for bronchodilator responsiveness. However, the extent to which practicing allergists implement sterility measures is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand the adherence to the American Thoracic Society guidelines for sterility among practicing allergists.

METHODS

In 2015, a questionnaire was approved and distributed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to all its members. The anonymous responses were recorded and tabulated after a 3-week period.

RESULTS

Of the 6800 allergists who received surveys from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology members, 496 participated in the survey (response rate 7.3%). Using metered dose inhalers with a spacer and nebulizers were the most common bronchodilator administration techniques, as indicated by 59.35% and 58.52% of responses, respectively. Whereas 69.25% of the allergists considered their bronchodilator administration techniques to be sterile, 14.05% did not consider their administration technique to be sterile and 16.70% were unsure. For maintaining sterility, 38.75% of the respondents indicated using a new disposable attachment for reused inhalers, 18.71% indicated using a new inhaler for each patient, and 9.13% reported wiping inhalers with a cleaning agent.

CONCLUSIONS

When asked about the sterility of the techniques used by them, nearly one-third of the allergists either stated that the measures used by them were unsterile or stated that they were were unsure. To increase adherence to sterility measures among North American allergists, promoting guideline awareness and proposing updated guidelines focused on the most common bronchodilator administration techniques is essential.

摘要

背景

美国胸科学会已发布支气管扩张剂反应性测试时的无菌操作通用指南。然而,目前尚不清楚执业过敏症专科医生实施无菌措施的程度。

目的

本研究旨在了解执业过敏症专科医生对美国胸科学会无菌指南的遵守情况。

方法

2015年,美国过敏、哮喘与免疫学会批准并向其所有成员发放了一份问卷。3周后记录并汇总匿名回复。

结果

在收到美国过敏、哮喘与免疫学会成员调查的6800名过敏症专科医生中,496人参与了调查(回复率7.3%)。分别有59.35%和58.52%的回复表明,使用带储雾罐的定量吸入器和雾化器是最常见的支气管扩张剂给药技术。69.25%的过敏症专科医生认为其支气管扩张剂给药技术是无菌的,14.05%的医生认为其给药技术不无菌,16.70%的医生不确定。为保持无菌,38.75%的受访者表示对重复使用的吸入器使用新的一次性附件,18.71%的受访者表示为每位患者使用新的吸入器,9.13%的受访者报告用清洁剂擦拭吸入器。

结论

当被问及他们所使用技术的无菌性时,近三分之一的过敏症专科医生要么表示他们所采取的措施不无菌,要么表示不确定。为提高北美过敏症专科医生对无菌措施的遵守情况,提高指南意识并提出针对最常见支气管扩张剂给药技术的更新指南至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3428/11426031/d00337338899/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验