Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(7):1469-1480. doi: 10.3233/JPD-240224.
Stigma is a relevant aspect of Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific stigma tools are needed to address the complex construct of stigma in PD comprehensively.
To test the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the newly developed Parkinson's Disease Stigma Questionnaire (PDStigmaQuest).
In this multi-center, cross-sectional study including PD patients and healthy controls, the dimensionality of the PDStigmaQuest was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Acceptability and psychometric properties were investigated. PDStigmaQuest scores of patients and healthy controls were compared.
In total, 201 PD patients and 101 healthy controls were included in the final analysis. Results suggested high data quality of the PDStigmaQuest (0.0001% missing data for patients). The exploratory factor analysis produced four factors: felt stigma, hiding, enacted stigma: rejection, and enacted stigma: patronization, explaining 47.9% of variance. An optional work domain for employed patients was included. Moderate floor effects and skewness, but no ceiling effects were found. Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 indicated high internal consistency. Calculated item-total correlations met standard criteria. Test-retest reliability was high (rs = 0.83). PDStigmaQuest scores correlated significantly with other stigma measures (rs = 0.56-0.69) and were significantly higher in patients than in healthy controls and higher in patients with depressive symptoms than in those without.
The patient-reported 18-item PDStigmaQuest showed strong psychometric properties of validity and reliability. Our results suggest that the PDStigmaQuest can be used to assess and evaluate stigma comprehensively in PD, which will improve our understanding of the construct of PD stigma.
污名是帕金森病(PD)的一个相关方面。需要特定的污名工具来全面解决 PD 中的污名这一复杂结构。
测试新开发的帕金森病污名问卷(PDStigmaQuest)的维度和心理测量特性。
在这项多中心、横断面研究中,包括 PD 患者和健康对照者,通过探索性因子分析检查 PDStigmaQuest 的维度。研究了可接受性和心理测量特性。比较了患者和健康对照者的 PDStigmaQuest 评分。
共有 201 名 PD 患者和 101 名健康对照者纳入最终分析。结果表明 PDStigmaQuest 数据质量高(患者缺失数据为 0.0001%)。探索性因子分析产生了四个因子:感觉污名、隐藏、实施污名:拒绝和实施污名:屈尊,解释了 47.9%的方差。为有工作的患者纳入了可选的工作领域。发现中度地板效应和偏度,但没有天花板效应。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.85,表明内部一致性高。计算的项目-总分相关性符合标准。重测信度高(rs=0.83)。PDStigmaQuest 评分与其他污名测量显著相关(rs=0.56-0.69),且患者的评分明显高于健康对照者,抑郁症状患者的评分高于无抑郁症状患者。
患者报告的 18 项 PDStigmaQuest 具有良好的有效性和可靠性心理测量特性。我们的研究结果表明,PDStigmaQuest 可用于全面评估 PD 中的污名,这将提高我们对 PD 污名结构的理解。