Moraes Leonardo Guedes da Silva, Oliveira Viviane de Cássia, Macedo Ana Paula, Freiria de Oliveira Carolina Alves, Watanabe Evandro, Pagnano Valéria Oliveira
Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Sep 25;38(5):559-569. doi: 10.11607/ijp.9133.
To evaluate the antibiofilm action of 2.5 mg/mL peracetic acid (PA), 0.5 mg/mL cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and 160 mg/mL N-acetylcysteine (NAC) against multispecies biofilm of Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata developed on surfaces of heat-polymerizing acrylic resin (AR) and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy.
A multispecies biofilm was grown on the surface of AR and Co-Cr specimens (Ø 12 × 3 mm). After biofilm maturation, the specimens were immersed in experimental solutions and evaluated through biofilm viability (CFU; n = 9), biofilm metabolic activity (XTT; n = 9), biofilm-covered areas (live/dead; n = 2), effects on the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS; n = 2), and biofilm morphology (n = 1). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test or Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn post-hoc test (α = .05).
Overall, all evaluated solutions impacted biofilm viability. PA presented wider activity by reducing CFU of all microorganisms on both surfaces, XTT (P < .001) and live/dead (P < .001). NAC had a notorious effect in reducing the viability of bacteria without affecting the yeasts. NAC reduced XTT on AR (P = .006) and Co-Cr (P = .003) but did not reduce the aggregated biofilm layer. CPC had a distinct effect, being most effective in reducing CFU on AR compared to the Co-Cr surface. However, it did not influence XTT or the amount of residual aggregated biofilm.
PA provided the greatest antibiofilm action, while CPC and NAC showed intermediate action. Nonetheless, no solution was able to completely remove the biofilm adhered to the surfaces of heat-polymerizing AR and Co-Cr alloy.
评估2.5mg/mL过氧乙酸(PA)、0.5mg/mL西吡氯铵(CPC)和160mg/mL N - 乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)对在热聚合丙烯酸树脂(AR)和钴铬(Co - Cr)合金表面形成的变形链球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、白色念珠菌和光滑念珠菌多菌种生物膜的抗生物膜作用。
在AR和Co - Cr标本(直径12×3mm)表面培养多菌种生物膜。生物膜成熟后,将标本浸入实验溶液中,并通过生物膜活力(CFU;n = 9)、生物膜代谢活性(XTT;n = 9)、生物膜覆盖面积(活/死;n = 2)、对细胞外聚合物(EPS;n = 2)的影响以及生物膜形态(n = 1)进行评估。数据通过方差分析和Tukey事后检验或Kruskal - Wallis检验,随后进行Dunn事后检验(α = 0.05)。
总体而言,所有评估溶液均影响生物膜活力。PA通过降低两种表面上所有微生物的CFU、XTT(P < 0.001)和活/死(P < 0.001)表现出更广泛的活性。NAC在降低细菌活力方面有显著效果,而不影响酵母菌。NAC降低了AR(P = 0.006)和Co - Cr(P = 0.003)上的XTT,但未减少聚集的生物膜层。CPC有明显效果,与Co - Cr表面相比,在降低AR上的CFU方面最有效。然而,它不影响XTT或残留聚集生物膜的量。
PA提供了最大的抗生物膜作用,而CPC和NAC表现出中等作用。尽管如此,没有一种溶液能够完全去除附着在热聚合AR和Co - Cr合金表面的生物膜。